透過您的圖書館登入
IP:18.117.79.92
  • 期刊

論“西崑體”及其在文學史上的地位

On the Xikuen School and Its Meaning in Chinese Literary History

若您是本文的作者,可授權文章由華藝線上圖書館中協助推廣。

摘要


本文旨在探究西崑體與李商隱詩的關係,並據此論述西崑體在文學史上的地位。西崑體長期以來被視為片面地模仿李商隱詩,論者對它的批評往往貶多於褒,對其文學史地位的評價也始終不高。本文希望重新考察這個問題。文中援用德國「接受美學」學派耀斯的觀點,將西崑體置於李商隱詩歌接受史的脈絡中進行討論,以說明西崑體在接受李商隱詩的過程中,採取的態度與反應;並進而分析此種態度、反應,在宋初詩壇所顯示的意義,期能重新評價西崑體的文學史地位。

並列摘要


In this paper, I would like to explore the relationships between the Xikuen School (本崑體) and Li Shang-yin (李商隱) and to re-evaluate its historical meaning. The Xikuen Style, for a long time, has been regarded as a lousy imitation of Li Shang-yin's poetry, which is gorgeous in. form while shallow in content, and therefore it has earned more negative than positive criticism. Since ever, critics have degraded its meaning in Chinese literary history. I will reconsider this topic from a new perspective, German critic Hans Robert Jauss' Reception Aesthetics, and put the formation of Xikuen Style under the context of the receptive history of Li Shang-yin's works. By this way, I will explain by what approaches and how the responses the Xikuen School received Li's poetry legacy, and further to analyze the meaning of such approaches and responses during the early Sung period. At the end, I want to re-evaluate the historical meaning of the Xikuen School.

參考文獻


張毅編(2001)。宋代文學研究。北京:北京出版社。
曾棗莊(1993)。論西崑體。高雄:麗文文化公司。
周益忠(1999)。西崑研究論集。臺北:臺灣學生書局。
Hans Robert Jauss(1982).Toward an Aesthetic of Reception, trans, Timothy Bahti.Minneapolis:University of Minnesota Press.
周寧、金元浦譯、滕守堯審校(1987)。走向接受美學|接受美學與接受理論。瀋陽:遼寧人民出版社。

延伸閱讀