透過您的圖書館登入
IP:216.73.216.60
  • 期刊

地方立法權之美麗與哀愁-以地方自治團體自治條例受中央函告無效為中心

The Beauty and Sorrow of the Local Legislative Government Power: Focusing on the Invalidation of the Self-government Ordinances by the Central Government Announcement

摘要


地方制度法第30條第1項雖明定「自治條例與憲法、法律或基於法律授權之法規或上級自治團體自治條例牴觸者,無效」,賦予地方自治團體基於地方立法權得制定自治法規,然實務上,屢見中央政府依該條規定函告地方自治團體自治條例無效,不僅造成中央與地方緊張關係,且不利於地方自治事項推展。本研究旨在探討地方自治團體自治條例被宣告無效之原因及相關爭議可操作之救濟程序,並透過外國立法例試圖提供解決之道,希望未來能提供類此爭議上判斷的依據,裨益於中央與地方間之府際關係。

並列摘要


Although the Local Government Act has given local self-governing bodies to formulate autonomous laws and regulations, however, the first paragraph of Article 30 of the Act stipulates that "Self-government ordinances shall become invalid if contradictory to the Constitution, laws, and regulations promulgated in accordance with laws or self-government ordinances of the superior self-governing bodies". In practice, there are several cases caused tension between local governments and the central government in recent years, and prevented the promotion of local autonomy. This study explores the reasons for the self-government ordinances being declared invalid, analyzes the operable remedy procedures for related disputes, and try to provide a solution through foreign legislation, hoping to provide the basis for relevant procedural judgments in the future, which will benefit the intergovernmental relationship between the central and local governments.

參考文獻


王毓正,〈中央與地方政府立法權限爭議解決機制之研析-以自治法規之事前監督(核定)為中心〉,《月旦法學雜誌》,第220期(2013年8月),6-21 頁。
王服清,〈中央與地方的文化權限劃分問題與其爭議解決途徑-以文化資產保存法為中心〉,《月旦法學雜誌》,第225期(2014年1月),51-73 頁。
李寧修。〈中央與地方之立法權限劃分及其爭議-以食品安全法制為例〉。《法學叢刊》,第 63 卷第 4 期(2018年10月),1-24 頁。
江嘉琪,〈地方自主立法權之範圍與合法界限-以臺灣地方自治法規制定實務為觀察中心〉,《月旦法學雜誌》,第234期(2014年10月)。15-29 頁。
林明昕,〈地方自治事項與委辦事項之委任及委託:以臺北市政府組織自治條例第二條第二項及第三項〉,《國立臺灣大學法學論叢》,第 39 卷第 4 期(2010年12月),213-298 頁。

延伸閱讀