田徑紀錄分析之研究

The Analysis of Track and Field Record

詹麗雲 ； 黃泰源 ； 蘇茂菘

《長榮運動休閒學刊》 2期 (2008/06) Pp. 13-25

https://doi.org/10.29632/CRYDSSSK.200806.0002

摘要

本研究以中華民國體育運動總會九十一年度發行的「世界、奧運、亞運、全國紀錄」之田徑紀錄為分析資料，將男子20個項目以及女子18個項目之世界、奧運、亞運、全國紀錄轉換為標準分數，共同比較，克服「時間型態紀錄」項目與「距離型態紀錄」項目無法比較的問題，提供田徑紀錄各項目間的差異性比較。分析結果發現，亞運、全國紀錄與奧運、世界紀錄的比較上，女子優於男子，長距離徑賽優於短距離徑賽以及田賽之項目。全國紀錄與亞運紀錄的比較上，由紀錄創造的時間來看，全國紀錄相較於亞運紀錄也有逐漸落後的趨勢。國內值得發展的項目為男子400M跨欄、3000M障礙、女子三級跳遠、撐竿跳等項目。

關鍵字

田徑紀錄 ； 標準分數

並列摘要

The purpose of this study is to convert track and field record to standardized scores. It enables this research to compare the record of different type of events in terms of time and distance. The data was from the ”World, Olympic, Asian and National track and field record” by the Republic of China Sports Federation of 2002. Comparing current athletics performance to the Asian, national, the Olympic, and world record, this study found out that woman's record was better then man's record, and that the long-distance events was better than a short distance events. When comparing national record to the Asian Game record, this study found out that the time gap between the national record the Asian Games record are gradually increased. Based upon this research, the most worthwhile events to invest are men's 400 M hurdles, 3000 M Steeplechase, women's triple jump, and pole vault.

並列關鍵字

Track and Field Records ； Standardized Scores

參考文獻

中華民國體育運動總會(2002)。世界、奧運、亞運、全國紀錄手冊。台北:

中華民國田徑協會(2002)。國際田徑規則2002~2003。台北:

許樹淵(1996)。田徑論。台北:偉彬體育研究社。