僧史家贊寧對高僧遺身爭議的詮釋

從宗教行爲的角度來看，僧傳中最具宗教情操，讀之最能引起讀者強烈宗教情感共鳴的篇章，應該是爲法忘軀的遺身之行。本文以《宋高僧傳•遺身篇》爲討論範圍，深入探討遺身現象及其宗教行爲的意義，並以慧皎、道宣的遺身觀點與贊寧作對照，以見其對捨身供養的解釋。贊寧雖重視佛教與世俗社會的協調，卻在系、通中，對教內、外都飽受爭議的捨身、燒身的宗教行爲，讚揚是無我利他的極致發心，認爲視燒身爲違犯戒律者，是執著於小乘戒法，強調發心的重要性而給予高度的肯定。

Keywords

贊寧；宋高僧傳；遺身；燒身；捨身；宗教行爲；供養

Parallel abstracts

From the perspective of religious conduct the most sentimental part of religious compassion is the self-immolation. This article would try to probe the significance of bodily sacrifice by the texts of 《Song Gaoseng Zhuan-chapter of bodily sacrifice》. Comparing the views of Hui-jiao and Dao-xuan to Zanning, the comparative textual research will display the different interpretation of the dedicating by self-immolation. The historian Zanning emphasizes the balance between Buddhism and society, but he also highly confirm the religious conduct: self-immolation, bodily sacrifice by burning, even though they are animadverted in Xi and Tong. Zanning highly praised the importance of altruistic arousal of the thought and the selfless giving is very noble beginning mind. Those who take Self-immolation against percepts are persisting Hinayana vinaya.

Parallel keywords

Zanning ； Song Gaoseng Zhuan ； Eminent monks ； Self-immolation ； Bodily sacrifice by burning ； Bodily sacrifice ； religious conduct ； dedicate ； give selflessly

Read-around

江燦騰（2009）。從解嚴前到解嚴後—戰後印順導師的人間淨土思想在台灣的變革、爭辯與分化發展。玄奘佛學研究，(12)，1-28。https://doi.org/10.29955/HCJBS.200909.0001
釋昭慧（2003）。印順導師不曾說過禪宗是「梵我外道」－回應慧昭法師與陳英善小姐之「印順法師說」。弘誓雙月刊，(62)，48-51。https://doi.org/10.29665/HS.200304.0009
陳玲芳（2010）。人死不能復生沉冤何時昭雪？尤伯祥律師的回顧與省思。司法改革雜誌，(78)，20-21。https://doi.org/10.30138/SFGGZJ.201006.0011
陳佩钰、林杏足（2005）。Narrative Research of Self-View of Pure Land Monks。輔導與諮商學報，27(2)，1-32。https://doi.org/10.7040/JGC.200512.0001
Tai, K. P. (2009). The Reinterpreted Justification of Evil. 華岡哲學學報, (1), 1-24. https://doi.org/10.29988/HKJP.200906.0001

Altmetrics

僧史家贊寧對高僧遺身爭議的詮釋

Download

Read this ↓