足球比賽中勝敗攻防轉換原因之探討

The Study of the Attack and Defense Switching Factors between Winning and Losing Teams in Soccer Games

黃文祥(Wen-Hsiang Huang) ； 黃泰盛(Tai-Shang Huang) ； 林澤民(Che-Ming Lin)

《教練科學》 Issue 4 (2004/08) Pp. 245-253

https://doi.org/10.6194/SCS.2004.04.25

Abstracts

本研究主要在探討足球比賽中勝隊與敗隊在攻守轉換因素之差異。分析的對象為2002年世界盃足球賽中的28場次。自年代電視錄製比賽過程，利用錄影帶再生觀看，記錄所有變數的次數。經卡方考驗獲得以下結論：
一、被搶、被截、被擋、犯規等變數，在勝隊與敗隊約達顯著差異。
二、勝隊在防守方面（被搶、被截、被擋）比敗隊突出。
三、勝隊在一對一逼搶上比敗隊表現佳。
四、勝隊在攔截戰術的使用上比敗隊優異。
五、勝隊在敗隊射門時阻擋球的飛行路線亦較敗隊好。
六、勝隊在犯規上較敗隊少，顯示自由球的機會較敗隊多。

Keywords

足球 ； 攻守轉換 ； 攻擊 ； 防禦

Parallel abstracts

The purpose of this study was to investigate the attack and defense switching factors between the soccer winning and losing teams. The Data were gathered from 28 games in 2002 World Cup Soccer Game. By video taping and repeatedly reviewing, the substantial findings were obtained by means of the computation of Chi-square:
1. There were no significant differences in the variables of 'being snatched,' 'being intercepted' 'being blocked,' and 'foul' between the winning and losing teams.
2. The winning teams performed better than the losing teams in defense factors, including 'being snatched,' 'being intercepted' and 'being blocked'.
3. The winning teams had better performance in 'one to one forced-snatch,' 'intercepting tactics,' and 'blocking the flight route in shooting'.
4. There were less fouls in the winning teams indicating that winning teams have more chances of free kicking.

Parallel keywords

Soccer ； Attack and defense switching ； Attack ； Defense

References

王君、羅伯平(1995)。優秀男子足球運動員一對一能力比較分析。廣州體育學院學報。15(4)，66-70。

周新華(1994)。第15屆世界盃足球賽失球情況的研究。中國體育科技。30(12)，27-28。

周衛民、李東楠(1994)。第15屆世界盃足球賽進球手段分析。四川體育科學。4，54-57。

馬純峰、鄭宏斌(1999)。關於第十六屆世界盃各隊橫、回傳球使用情況的研究。北京體育大學學報。22(3)，111-113。

唐峰(2001)。歐洲足球錦標賽主要防守戰術運用分析。北京體育大學學報。24(2)，264-266。