- 期刊
大歷史下的小家族－嘉慶年版《楊氏族譜》解讀
Interpretation of the Jiaqing Year Version of ＂Yang's Genealogy＂
摘要
本文源於四川省重慶市楊氏族人所提供的一部嘉慶十一年刊印的《楊氏族譜》為研究起點，重點解讀刊於《楊氏族譜》譜前之十三篇序言。由序言抽絲剝繭出諸多問題並嘗試給予解答，以民國期間《合川縣誌》上記載的黑神廟楊氏為出發點，推論出黑神廟的信仰特質是標示這一支楊氏族人原來自於貴州，也暗示他們原屬軍籍的出身背景。再按時間順序統整出這本《楊氏族譜》的編輯過程，了解族譜刊刻的費用問題及後續衍伸出的手抄本紛爭。且以序文中提到的「義郎」、「部卒」、「僕從」、「兵丁」論證明代楊氏族人軍籍的身分。最後考證出，入清後的楊氏族人建構出虛實相間的明代家族史，以明代大儒楊繼盛為先祖的紀錄不可能為真，只是要藉此榮顯自家子孫。做為大歷史洪流下的小家族，黑神廟楊氏家族留存下的印刷本及手抄本族譜應該還有許多未發掘之部分待後人考證。
並列摘要
This article originated from the ＂Yang Family Tree＂ published by the Yang Clan in Chongqing, Sichuan Province, which was published in the 11th year of Jiaqing as the starting point of the study, focusing on the preface to the thirteen prefaces published in the ＂Yang Family Tree＂. From the preface, I have tried to solve many problems and tried to give answers. Based on the black temple Yang, recorded in the Hechuan County Annals during the Republic of China, it is inferred that the belief in the black temple is that the Yang clan was originally from Guizhou. It also implies that they were originally from the background of military origin. Then, in the chronological order, the editing process of the ＂Yang's Genealogy＂ will be integrated to understand the cost of the genealogy and the subsequent manuscript disputes. The identity of the Yang clan military is proved by the ＂Yi Lang＂, ＂Minister＂, ＂Servant＂ and ＂Army＂ mentioned in the preface. Finally, it is proved that after the Qing Dynasty, the Yang clan people constructed a fictional family history of the Ming Dynasty, and the record of the ancestors of the great Confucian Yang Jisheng in the Ming Dynasty could not be true, but only to show their own children and grandchildren. As a small family under the torrent of great history, the printed version of the Yang family of the Black Temple and the genealogy of the manuscript should have many unexplored parts to be verified by future generations.