- 期刊
- OpenAccess
Creative Immanence, Affects and Cetacean Imagination: A Deleuzian Reading of Hung-Chi Liao's Ocean Writing
內在創造性、情動力、鯨靈想像：一種德勒茲解讀廖鴻基的海洋書寫
摘要
本論文主要從德勒茲哲學思想來解讀台灣當代散文家廖鴻基的系列海洋鯨靈想像書寫。在德勒茲的思維中，內在性創造動能是一個重要概念。在《何謂哲學？》專書，德勒茲就解釋概念是一種事件的發生，內在平面是思維基層，也就是前思維階段，潛藏事件概念而由此衍生思維意象。簡言之，內在平面是哲思最絕對的基層，這基層將無名概念轉譯為具體意象，因此這是屬於潛像創造力。從這樣的角度，來解讀廖鴻基鯨靈想像的海洋書寫，我們瞭解他這種另類的液態想像接觸是一樁思維事件，一種根莖式解域過程，將內在潛藏情動力轉譯為鯨靈海洋意象。在廖鴻基三十多歲遭遇人生轉折點，遠離陸地僵硬的位階意識，投入海洋工作，因此海洋象徵著他內在蘊含情動力轉譯的創造力，另闢人生視野與重新創造新生命。鯨豚是聰穎的海洋哺乳動物，廖鴻基與他們的接觸，開展另一個想像空間，進而觸動內在藝術動能，讓內在性「非人」的情動力轉譯新思維。海洋想像邀請他進入某種精神晉升的流變過程，一種逃逸創造的路線。如同德勒茲在《千重台》所言，流變是一種內在轉譯力量，廖鴻基透過鯨靈想像開啟自我新的認同。
並列摘要
In this short paper, I attempt to use Deleuzian theories to interpret a series of poetic prose pieces on whales and dolphins by the famous Taiwanese writer and fisherman, Hung-Chi Liao. The idea of immanence is important throughout the whole Deleuzian philosophical enterprise. In What Is Philosophy?, Deleuze explains that concepts are events and the plane of immanence is the reservoir of conceptual events that give rise to the image of thought. In other words, the plane of immanence is the absolute ground of philosophy where concepts are created and thus indicates a possibility of virtual creativity. From this perspective, when we read Liao's remarkably poetic prose pieces on whales and dolphins, we feel that his alternative form of contact with the ocean is an event, a crucial moment of deterritorialization that has brought him to ＂actualize＂ his creative immanence. In his thirties, after a traumatic event that forced him to break away from the land, the ocean as a line of flight became Liao's ＂rhizomatic territory＂ to create a new life. Whales and dolphins are intelligent marine mammals and his contact with them seems to have indirectly triggered the creative force of the immanence in him. The ocean imagination has invited him to dive into ＂a line of becoming.＂ As Deleuze has argued in A Thousand Plateaus that every becoming is an involution, not an imitation, Liao's ocean writing on becoming dolphins and whales has brought him to a new identity-a very successful writer with a deep connection to the ocean.
參考文獻
延伸閱讀
- 吳智雄（2013）。回歸文本：論廖鴻基《討海人》的寫作特色。海洋文化學刊，(14)，83-104。https://www.airitilibrary.com/Article/Detail?DocID=a0000442-201306-201412300017-201412300017-83-104
- 劉益州（2011）。巨大化的書寫：論鯨向海詩集《大雄》中情感表述的藝術與想像。臺灣詩學學刊，(18)，151-174。https://doi.org/10.29813/TP.201112.0007
- 陳靜容（2008）。“命名”、“信仰”與“海洋”的重奏－達悟族口傳文學中的“動物故事”及其內在文化意涵研究。海洋文化學刊，(4)，25-48。https://doi.org/10.29473/OCJ.200806.0002
- 王國安（2012）。殊途同歸：試論夏曼‧藍波安與廖鴻基海洋書寫的異同。人文社會科學研究，6(2)，120-139。https://doi.org/10.6284/NPUSTHSSR.2012.6(2)6
- 楊政源（2012）。海洋文學在台灣文學場域的興起──以夏曼．藍波安與廖鴻基為觀察核心〔博士論文，國立中正大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://www.airitilibrary.com/Article/Detail?DocID=U0033-2110201613514113