Propofol Significantly Attenuates iNOS, CAT-2, and CAT-2B Transcription in Lipopolysaccharide-stimulated Murine Macrophages

Propofol抑制酯多醣於巨噬細胞所誘發之iNOS、CAT-2及CAT-2B的表現

劉孟琦(Meng-Chi Liu) ； 蔡佩珊(Pei-Shan Tsai) ； 楊承憲(Chen-Hsien Yang) ； 劉正鴻(Cheng-Hung Liu) ； 陳建全(Chien-Chuan Chen) ； 黃俊仁(Chun-Jen Huang)

《Acta Anaesthesiologica Taiwanica》 44卷2期 (2006/07) Pp. 73-81

摘要

背景：Propofol會抑制酯多醣(LPS)於巨噬細胞所誘發一氣化氮合成酶(iNOS)的表現及一氣化氮(NO)之合成。第二型正電荷胺基酸運輸酶（包括CAT-2及CAT-2B）可經由控制左旋精胺(L-arginine)之運輸來調控iNOS之活性。此研究之目的乃在於探討propofol對CAT-2及CAT-2B表現及L-arginine運輸之影響。
方法：吾人採用LPS刺激老鼠巨噬細胞(RAW264.7)之模式來誘發NO之產生、L-arginine之運輸及iNOS、CAT-2與CAT-2B的表現，而propofol(25, 50, and 75μM)則分別於LPS刺激前四小時、LPS刺激後或LPS刺激後四小時加入細胞培養中；待與LPS反應十八小時後，吾人收集巨噬細胞並加以分析。
結果：於LPS刺激前四小時加入之propofol對LPS所誘發NO之產生、L-arginine之運輸及iNOS與CAT-2的表現並無明顯作用；令人意外的是，於LPS刺激後立即加入之25μM propofol加強了iNOS之表現及NO之產生，而於LPS刺激後立即加入之50μM propofol 對iNOS之表現及NO之產生並無明顯作用，於LPS刺激後立即加入之75μM propofol則明顯抑制iNOS之表現及NO之產生。於LPS刺激後立即加入之50及75μM propofol則明顯抑制CAT-2之表現及L-arginine之運輸，而25μM propofol則無此作用。另外，於LPS刺激後四小時加入之75μM propofol明顯抑制NO之產生、L-arginine之運輸及iNOS與CAT-2之表現，而25及50μM propofol則無此作用。CAT-2B之表現則明顯受到於LPS刺激前四小時、LPS刺激後或LPS刺激後四小時加入之propofol的抑制。
結論：Propofol對LPS於巨噬細胞所誘發之NO之產生、L-arginine之運輸及iNOS、CAT-2與CAT-2B的表現具明顯的抑制作用。而propofol之劑量及施與之時間點均會影響此一作用。

關鍵字

Propofol ； 一氧化氮合成酶 ； Cationic amino acid transporter 2 ； 酯多醣 ； 巨噬細胞

並列摘要

Background: Propofol significantly inhibits inducible nitric oxide synthase (iNOS) expression and nitric oxide (NO) biosynthesis in stimulated macrophages. L-arginine transport mediated by the isozymes of type-2 cationic amino acid transporter (including CAT-2 and CAT-2B) has been reported to play a crucial role in regulating iNOS activity. We sought to evaluate the effects of propofol on L-arginine transport and transcription of CAT-2 and CAT-2B.
Methods: Confluent murine macrophages (RAW264.7 cells) were stimulated with lipopolysaccharide (LPS) to induce NO production, L-arginine transport and the transcriptions of iNOS, CAT-2, and CAT-2B. Propofol (25, 50, and 75 μM) was added to the cells 4 hours before, immediately after, or 4 hours after LPS administration. After reacting with LPS for 18 hours, cell cultures were harvested and assayed.
Results: Propofol administered 4 hours before LPS had no significant effects on NO production, L-arginine transport, and the transcriptions of iNOS and CAT-2. To our surprise, NO production and iNOS transcription were significantly enhanced by 25μM propofol administered immediately after LPS. NO production and iNOS transcription were not affected by 50μM propofol but significantly inhibited by 75μM propofol administered immediately after LPS. CAT-2 transcription and L-arginine transport were significantly inhibited by 50 and 75μM but not 25μM propofol administered immediately after LPS. When administered 4 hours after LPS, 75 but not 25 and 50μM propofol significantly inhibited NO production, L-arginine transport, and the transcription of iNOS and CAT-2. In addition, CAT-2B transcription was significantly inhibited by propofol that was administered 4 hours before, immediately after, or 4 hours after LPS.
Conclusions: Propofol had significantly inhibitory effects on LPS-induced NO production, L-arginine transport, and the expressions of iNOS, CAT-2 and CAT-2B in stimulated murine macrophages in a dose-dependent manner. In addition, timing of administration also affected this regulatory effect of propofol.

並列關鍵字

Propofol ； Nitric oxide synthase ； Cationic Amino Acid Transporter 2 ； Lipopolysaccharides ； Macrophage