水土保持法中“連續處罰”及“限期改正”制度之法律研究

Jurisprudence Research on the Systems of Continuous Punishments and Curing within a Prescribed Time Limit for the Soil and Water Conservation Act

許宏達(Hung-Ta Hsu) ； 陳重光(Chung-Kuang Chen)

《中華水土保持學報》 35卷4期 (2004/12) Pp. 323-330

https://doi.org/10.29417/JCSWC.200412_35(4).0004

摘要

本文嘗試以法律學角度來分析水土保持法中有關連續處罰及限期改正的相關問題。按連續處罰常見於各類環保法規中，於水土保持法中亦然；其藉由不斷累積金錢給付之處罰方式，對於義務人頗具壓迫力，經常為行政機關所採。本文首先介紹連續處罰的法律性質，藉由法理之探討賦予其正當性基礎；此外，並透過整理分析全國各縣市實際執行之現況，探討該制度所面臨的問題與挑戰。至於限期改正，則係伴隨連續處罰之另一制度，本文亦一併介紹現行法之限期改正制度、法理依據及實務上所遇到的難題，並尋求解決之道。

關鍵字

法律學 ； 連續處罰 ； 限期改正 ； 正當性基礎

並列摘要

This article attempts to analyze, using the jurisprudence approach, the questions raised by the Soil and Water Conservation Act to do with the systems of continuous punishments and curing within a prescribed time limit. Continuous punishments are a common feature of environmental protection laws and regulations, as well as the Soil and Water Conservation Act. The method of steadily accumulating a fine effectively oppresses those that breached to law, therefore this system is frequently used by administrative organizations, and in actuality has the desired effect. This article discusses the characteristics of the continuous punishments law aspects at their inception, and justifies their legitimacy through legal theory. This article also discusses the problems and challenges of the system by arranging and analyzing the status quo in all of the countries. As for the system of curing within a prescribed time limit, it is always accompanied by another system, continuous punishments, This article introduces this system, it's judicial foundation, and limitations. Finally, it tries to work out solutions to these problems.

並列關鍵字

jurisprudence ； continuous punishments ； curing within a prescribed time limit ； legitimacy