透過您的圖書館登入
IP:216.73.216.100
  • 期刊

基金風險狀態與投資人之處分效果:追蹤門檻模型的應用

Risk States of Funds and Fund Investors' Disposition Effects: Application of the Panel Threshold Model

摘要


本文探討在不同基金風險狀態下,當投資人面對不同程度的獲利及損失時,是否發生不同型態的處分效果。本研究先以追蹤門檻模型區分基金高與低風險狀態,再將基金績效區分為兩類及五類績效指標,來探討基金投資人的處分效果。 實證結果發現,在不同基金風險狀態下,基金投資人發生不同型態的處分效果:例如,於高基金風險狀態下,當績效為輸家、小輸與大輸,投資人均發生「拙於贖回輸家」之處分效果:而於低基金風險狀態下,當績效為小輸時,投資人發生文獻上鮮見的「逆處分效果」,即投資人積極贖回績效較差的基金;於低基金風險狀態下,當績效為輸家與大輸時,投資人發生「贖回輸家比率更低」之處分效果。除了以基金層次資料之實證結果進行分析外,本研究再以基金投資人層次資料等之實證結果進行驗證,發現實證結果均具穩健性。

並列摘要


The purpose of this paper is to study whether fund investors have different patterns of disposition effect under different risk states and differences in performance. First, we use panel threshold model to separate the risk slates of funds, and we further separate the fund's performance into two and five performance indicators to study the fund investors' disposition effects. Our results are as follows. The fund investors do have different patterns of disposition effect under different risk states and differences in performance. For example, in the high-risk state, when the fund's performance gives rise to a loser, a moderate capital loss and an extreme capital loss, the investors all possess the disposition effect-i. e., a reluctance to redeem the loser. However, in the low-risk state, when the funds performance results in a moderate capital loss, the investors posses the inverse disposition effect, i.e., a active to redeem the loser, and this effect is seldom observed in the prior literature. However, when the fund's performance results in a loser and an extreme capital loss, the investors possess the disposition effect-i. e., a greater reluctance to redeem the loser Our findings are robust to aggregate, investor levels, and the others robustness testing factors.

參考文獻


李建興、沈中華、顏碧霞(2010)。從眾贖回與非從眾續回下基金投資人處分效果之探討:分量迴歸最小平方虛擬變數法。管理與系統。17(7),1-26。
沈中華、郭照榮、陳曉蓉(2001)。台灣銀行業的淨利息邊際決定因素。財務金融學刊。9(1),47-83。
許光華、林秉瑋(2005)。散戶投資人處分效果之研究─考量公司市場價值下之實證結果。管理學報。22(1),85-107。
Annaert, J.,Heymanb, D.,Vanmaelec, M.,Van Osselaerb, S.(2008).Disposition Bias and Overconfidence in Institutional Trades.European Financial Management Symposium.(European Financial Management Symposium).:
Bergstresser, D.,Poterba, J.(2002).Do After-Tax Returns Affect Mutual Fund Inflows.Journal of Financial Economics.63(3),381-414.

被引用紀錄


張佳鳳(2015)。中國股票型基金擇時與選股能力評估〔碩士論文,淡江大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://doi.org/10.6846/TKU.2015.00386
鄭翰紘(2014)。美國高收益債券型基金之風險管理與擇時能力之實證研究〔碩士論文,淡江大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://doi.org/10.6846/TKU.2014.01018
徐孟淳(2014)。台灣股票型基金之擇時與選股能力再驗證〔碩士論文,淡江大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://doi.org/10.6846/TKU.2014.00901
黃欽裕(2013)。市場狀態與處分效果-以股票型與平衡型基金為例〔碩士論文,國立臺北科技大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://www.airitilibrary.com/Article/Detail?DocID=U0006-1906201312101200

延伸閱讀