邵慶旺、盧泰康(2023)提倡從科學分析及藝術史學跨領域的視角合作進行古物的研究,試圖提供多元的證據協助研究者對兒玉源太郎頭像殘件有更深入了解值得被肯定。然而,作者對於頭像材質檢測數據的錯誤解釋,並於結論指出兒玉源太郎頭像材質並非史料所云為「大理石」,可能造成後續讀者對該古物及史料有錯誤理解。
Cing-wang Shao and Tai-kang Lu (2023) advocated for an interdisciplinary approach combining scientific analysis and art history to conduct research on antiquities. They aimed to provide diverse evidence to help researchers gain a deeper understanding of the bust of Kodama Gentaro, which is commendable. However, their erroneous interpretation of the geochemical data, concluding that the bust is not "marble," could lead to subsequent misunderstandings of the antiquity and related historical materials.