全球化趨勢中婚姻移民之人權保障：全球化、台灣新國族主義、人權論述的關係

Marriage Immigrants' Human Rights in the Trend of Globalization: Globalization, Neo-Taiwanese Nationalism, and the Discourse over Human Rights

廖元豪(Yuan-Hau Liao)

《思與言：人文與社會科學期刊》 44卷3期 (2006/09) Pp. 81-129

https://doi.org/10.6431/TWJHSS.200609.0081

摘要

在欠缺對跨國移民與全球化的認知下，加上採取落伍版本的國族主義思維，我國移民法其實是一整套「移民管制法」，而非「移民權利保障法」。移民法基本上是負面且未加深思地預設這些新移民乃是社會「問題」、「入侵者」、「資源搶奪者」；而全未深入理解移民的成因與貢獻。因此本文先行分析現行移民法制岐視、侵害新移民人權之處，指出現行政策完全站在本土種族主義之上。接著從全球化與台灣新國族主義的衝突分析此等現象的可能成因。最後試圖站在全球化的理解下，提出保障移民人權的認知基礎，以為修正移民法制之基礎。

關鍵字

婚姻移民 ； 移民法 ； 全球化 ； 台灣新國族主義 ； 本土種族主義 ； 人權

並列摘要

Due to the lack of knowledge about international migration and globalization, plus the adoption of an anachronistic version of nationalism, Taiwan's immigration law is a scheme simply to regulate immigrants, not to protect the rights thereof. The immigration legal scheme negatively and recklessly assumes that the newly arrived immigrants are the ”social problems”, ”intruder”, or ”resource predator”; it has never fully appreciated the causes and contributions of those immigrants. This article first analyzes how the current immigration discriminates against Taiwan's newly-arrived marriage immigrants, and accordingly indicates that the existing immigration policy stands against the background of nativism. Then the author tries to figure out the origins of this sort of nativistic discrimination in light of the conflict between globalization and the emerging neo-Taiwanese nationalism. In terms of the analysis over globalization, this article offers a new background understanding of immigrants' human rights; the author suggests that Taiwan's immigration law should be revised accordingly.

並列關鍵字

marriage immigrant ； immigration law ； globalization ； Neo-Taiwanese nationalism ； nativism ； human rights

參考文獻

立法院內政及民族委員會(2005)。

See e. g.,Mari J. Matsuda,Y□□□ L. J.,U. C. Davis. L. Rev(1991).Voices of America: Accent, Antidiscrimination Law, and Jurisprudence for the Last Rconstruction.Carlos Villarreal, Culture in Lawmaking-A Chicano Perspective.1193

趙剛、杜威(1997)。什麽是「民主」?什麽是「公共」？－杜威對自由主義的批判與重建。台灣社會研究季刊。25，33。

廖元豪(2006)。移民：民權的漏洞，還是民權的延伸？－評介Kevin R. Johnson的The "Huddled Masses" Myth: Immigration and Civil Rights。台灣社會研究季刊。61，417。