透過您的圖書館登入
IP:3.145.177.28
  • 期刊

歐盟引渡制度之新變革…以歐盟逮捕令為逮捕及解送之新制

Revolution in Extradition in the EU-The European Arrest Warrant and the Surrender Procedures within European Union Member States

摘要


為建構歐盟成為自由、安全及正義之地區,歐盟部長理事會於2002年6月13日通過「歐盟逮補令及解送程序架構協定」,廢除會員國之間的引渡,改由會員國之間的司法機關以解送制度取代,成為歐盟刑事法推動相互承認原則的第一部具體措施,經歐盟喻為司法合作之里程磚。 整部歐盟逮補令架構協定除了在程序面上改以解送取代引渡之外,實質面上包括相互承認原則、缺席判決、一事不再理原則、雙重犯罪原則及國民不引渡原則等也有改變。政治犯不引渡原則更已在新制度中消失。 歐盟逮補令架構協定雖可稱為國民不引渡原則的新突破,但實務上有兩件有關國民引渡(解送)問題的違憲案例值得討論,第一件是2005年4月27日波蘭憲法法院關於「荷蘭請求波蘭依歐盟逮補令解送波蘭國民Maria D.」案,第二件是2005年7月18日德國聯邦憲法法院關於「西班牙請求德國依歐盟逮補令解送敘利亞裔德國公民Mamoun Darkazanli」案。 按歐盟逮補令架構協定尚屬新的司法合作模式,本文擬就其發展的歷史背景、條文內容、幾項新思維及上述兩件實務案例進行探討,希望對於本世紀歐盟會員國之間的逮補及解送新制度有一認識與了解。

並列摘要


To become an area of freedom, security and justice, the Council of the European Union adopted, on 13 June 2002, the Council Framework Decision on the European Arrest Warrant and the Surrender Procedures between Member States (the EAW), which has led to abolishing extradition between member States and replacing it by a system of surrender between judicial authorities. The EAW is the first concrete measure in the field of criminal law implementing the principle of mutual recognition, which the European Council referred to as the 'cornerstone' of judicial cooperation. The procedural change of the Framework Decision is the replacement of extradition by surrender. The substantive changes include the Principle of Mutual Recognition, Verdicts in Absentia, the Principle of Ne Bis in Idem, the Principle of Double Criminality, and the Principle of Non-Extradition of Nationals. Furthermore, the political offence exception has vanished in the EAW. While the Framework Decision makes possible the extradition (now the surrender) of nationals, there are two relevant rulings that should be referred to: First, the Judgment of the Poland Constitutional Tribunal on April 27, 2005 concerning the Netherlands' request of surrender of Polish National Maria D., and second, the judgment of the German Federal Constitutional Court on July 18, 2005 concerning the Spain's request of surrender of Mamoun Darkazanli, a German and Syrian national. Since the EAW Framework Decision is a newly developed model of judicial cooperation in criminal matters, this article will focus on the historical developments, the introduction of the EAW articles, some paradigm shifts, and the typical rulings, hoping to have a better understanding and knowledge toward the new system of surrender within the Europe Union of the century.

參考文獻


陳榮傑(1985)。引渡之理論與實踐。
陳勁(1999)。歐洲聯盟之整合與體制運作。
陳勁(2002)。歐盟外交政策與對外關係。
陳麗娟(1999)。阿姆斯特丹條約解讀。
陳麗娟(2005)。歐洲共同體法導論。

被引用紀錄


朱柔潔(2009)。九一一事件後歐洲聯盟與美國在歐洲地區的反恐合作(2001-2007年)〔碩士論文,淡江大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://doi.org/10.6846/TKU.2009.00522
徐意涵(2010)。國際法上引渡制度之探討〔碩士論文,中原大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://doi.org/10.6840/cycu201000559
邵允亮(2012)。一事不再理原則(ne bis in idem)及其跨國性運用〔碩士論文,國立臺灣大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://doi.org/10.6342/NTU.2012.00663
張世東(2009)。從比較法觀點論我國環境刑法運作上之難題〔碩士論文,國立臺北大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://www.airitilibrary.com/Article/Detail?DocID=U0023-0209200921230300
劉倩妤(2016)。國際刑事司法互助與跨境取證—借鏡歐盟法〔碩士論文,國立中正大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://www.airitilibrary.com/Article/Detail?DocID=U0033-2110201614065932

延伸閱讀