任親權人之一方死亡時他方親權是否當然回復－最高法院六十二年度台上字第一三九八號判例評析

Whether the Parental Rights are Spontaneously Resumed by the Surviving Parent upon the Death of the One with the Rights-An Analysis of Supreme Court Precedents Year 62- No. 3473(Supreme Court Case, Ta

李玲玲(Ling-Ling Lee)

《東吳法律學報》 19卷1期 (2007/07) Pp. 143-164

https://doi.org/10.6416/SLR.200707.0143

摘要

任親權人之一方死亡時，他方之親權是否當然回復，我國在法無明文之情形下，學者通說及實務上均採親權當然復活說。惟，此種見解在由法院酌定或改定親權人之場合，則未免過於漠視法院之監督角色。日本同樣在法無明文之情形下，學界及實務界卻有多種學說。本文擬藉由日本學說之介紹，檢討我國學說與實務見解之是否妥當。

關鍵字

親權 ； 監護 ； 親權人之酌定 ； 濫用親權 ； 子女利益

並列摘要

Upon the death of the parent granted with the parental rights, major doctrines and precedents, on the basis that the current laws are silent in this regard, have adopted a position that the rights are spontaneously resumed by the surviving parent. Such a position, however, particularly in a situation in which the parental rights were first awarded or reassigned by the court, may have neglected the supervisory privileges of the court. While in Japan the laws are also silent in this regard, various opinions were provided under different doctrines and precedents. With reference to such opinions, this article is to review and examine the validity of the doctrines and precedents in our country.

並列關鍵字

Parental Rights ； Custody ； Selection of Parent with Parent Rights ； Abusive Use of Parental Rights ； Children's Interests

參考文獻

(1976)。中華民國民法制定史料彙編下冊。台北:司法行政部。

史尚寬(1974)。親屬法論。台北:史尚寬。

李玲玲(1997)。「論離婚後之親權及其修正」固有法制與當代民事法學（戴東雄教授六秩華誕祝壽論文集）。台北:三民。

李宜琛(1966)。現行親屬法論。台北:台灣商務印書館。

林菊枝(1982)。親屬法專題研究。台北:林菊枝。