透過您的圖書館登入
IP:18.117.79.92
  • 期刊

臺北都會區港口城市的困局再生中的基隆?

Shrinking Seaport in Metropolitan Taipei Regenerating Keelung City?

摘要


以全球城市為核心所構成之城市區域,已成為全球化過程中,新興的學術及政策論辯焦點,不僅被認為是新自由主義政策論述及實踐的重要實驗場所,並且存在一個假說:這些區域內部的城市,經常以合作聯盟的方式,共同強化在全球當中的領域競爭力。本文透過基隆再生論述、實踐及其現實的觀察,討論分析新自由主義化具體實踐的真實樣貌。本文指出,基隆市,作為臺北都會區中一個曾經輝煌的港口城市,近年來陸續浮現功能萎縮、城市衰退及轉型的壓力,主要交織著三個結構性困境:(1)後工業化時期,傳統單核心港埠經濟發展危機;(2)臺北市及新北市的磁吸效果,以及基隆市依賴經濟體的制度慣性,造成不對等的城際網絡競爭;(3)在雙北市的城際競爭中,基隆市採取同質的競爭策略,反而使其進一步陷入危機當中,進一步加速基隆市在城市區域中功能角色的邊緣化。顯然,新自由主義在城市區域的具體實踐,與理論上的說法有相當的落差。

並列摘要


Globalization not only focuses on a few important global cities that adapt to the global economic order, but also integrates cities located in close proximity to one another into global city-regions. City-regions are important sites of policy experimentation involving new regulatory structures and governance spaces that are strongly influenced by neoliberal policy discourses and practices. However, current work on city-regions is in danger of making a priori assumptions-coherent inter-urban networks and empowered regional governance entities must be created to strengthen territorial competitiveness in the process of globalization. This paper thus aims to examine a realistic neo-liberal city-region by exploring the discourse and reality of regeneration in Keelung City. Once a thriving seaport in metropolitan Taipei, Keelung City today is shrinking, and its transformation is interweaved with three predicaments. First, the traditional port-based economy suffered a crisis in the post-industrial era. Second, the city faces problems of population and capital flight as a result of the magnetic attraction from central Metropolitan Taipei. Third, Keelung City's institutional inertia of following so-called neoliberal best practice strategies potentially is accelerating its marginalization. Obviously, a considerable gap exists between the neoliberal theoretical script and the reality in city-regions.

參考文獻


天下雜誌(2003)。25 縣市的競爭力排行榜。天下雜誌。280,138-47。
天下雜誌(2011)。2011 幸福城市大調查。天下雜誌。480,54-60。
王文誠(2006)。全球化趨勢下的都會治理:高雄的挑戰。環境與世界。13,36-56。
中央社新聞網 [Zhong yang she xin wen wang; CNA NEWS] 2012。紓解交通、藍綠拼捷運到基隆 [Shu jie jiao tong, lan lyu pin jie yun dao ji long]。http://www2.cna.com.tw/News/aALL/201201030267.aspx (擷取日期:2012.02.06) 。
立法院公報 [Li fa yuan gong bao] 2009。院會記錄 [Yuan hui ji lu]。立法院公報 [Li fa yuan gong bao] 99(5): 22-3。

被引用紀錄


黃柏叡(2016)。漁會侍從連結的變遷(1985-2016)-以基隆區漁會 為例〔碩士論文,國立臺灣大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://doi.org/10.6342/NTU201603851
蔡智潁(2015)。基隆何去何從?--從生活世界的觀點論北北基合併議題〔碩士論文,國立臺灣大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://doi.org/10.6342/NTU.2015.11162
黃子倫、朱凌毅、徐進鈺(2022)。都市化的批判-Neil Brenner全域都市化與資本主義的存續地理學報(102),37-53。https://doi.org/10.6161/jgs.202208_(102).0003

延伸閱讀