透過您的圖書館登入
IP:18.224.39.74
  • 期刊

鴉片戰爭時期中英鐵砲材質的優劣比較研究

A Comparative Study of the Material Quality of Chinese and British Iron Cannons from the Opium War

摘要


鴉片戰爭時期,中英鐵砲砲身均為鑄鐵組織,不同的是,清軍鐵砲以白口鑄鐵為主,英軍鐵砲則以灰口鑄鐵為主。在灰口鑄鐵組織中的石墨形態上,清軍鐵砲皆為片狀石墨;英軍鐵砲除片狀石墨外,還有菊花狀石墨,其占灰口鑄鐵總數的 25% 。由於菊花狀石墨組織的灰口鑄鐵性能比片狀或粗大的石墨構成的灰口鑄鐵要好,故英軍鐵砲材質優於清軍。此外,英軍鐵砲的鑄造及加工技術亦優於清軍鐵砲。由於鐵砲的材質、製造和加工技術直接關係鐵砲的質量,而鐵砲質量則是影響鐵砲性能的最重要因素,故中英鐵砲性能上的差異是影響鴉片戰爭勝負的關鍵因素之一。

並列摘要


Although both cast in metal, Chinese cannons dating from the Opium War were different from the British ones in microstructure. First of all, the proportions of white iron and gray iron in the cannon bodies were different. The Chinese cannon bodies were largely cast in white iron, while the British ones were mostly cast in gray iron. Secondly, the shapes of graphite in the gray iron composition show some differences. In the Chinese cannons, the graphite is mostly in the form of flakes; however, in the British cannons, the graphite has two forms (75% flakes, 25% flowers). Flower-shaped graphite provides for better-quality gray iron. In addition, Britain had better casting and processing technologies. As a result of these factors, British cannons from the Opium War were of better quality than Chinese ones, and this, in turn, affected British performance. We believe that the difference in cannon composition was one of the major factors that decided the outcome of the Opium War.

參考文獻


丁拱辰(1843)。演砲圖說輯要。中國國家圖書館。
中國第一歷史檔案館編(1992)。鴉片戰爭檔案史料。天津:天津古籍出版社。
茅海建主編(2005)。清代兵事典籍檔冊匯覽。北京:學苑出版社。
黃達權譯、王韜撰(1993)。中國叢書集成。北京:解放軍出版社。

被引用紀錄


陳俊宇、張舜孔、蔡育林(2015)。清除鐵質器物表面腐蝕物處理方式評估報告文化資產保存學刊(34),36-50。https://doi.org/10.6941/JCHC.201512_(34).0002

延伸閱讀