全民造林停止後山坡地造林政策之分析

An Analysis of Reforestation Policy of Slopeland after the Termination of the Reforestation Policy

林國慶(Kuo-Ching Lin) ； 柳婉郁(Wan-Yu Liu) ； 陳昱安(Yu-An Chen)

《中華林學季刊》 42卷4期 (2009/12) Pp. 577-594

https://doi.org/10.30064/QJCF.200912.0008

摘要

本研究主要分析全民造林政策實施至2004年底之成果，了解全民造林執行下，是否達成預期之政策目標，並探討在全民造林停止後，國內山坡地將如何進行造林，是否需要造林政策，造林政策之方向為何。本研究透過分析全民造林之成果，及針對國內相關之政府官員、學者專家以及環保人士進行問卷調查。並依據分析上述結果提出未來造林政策之建議。本研究建議(1)全民造林停辦後，我國仍需研擬新的造林獎勵政策；(2)新的造林獎勵政策應考量不同地理條件，因地制宜；(3)全民造林對於在優先造林地實施造林及解決山坡地超限利用問題之成效有限，處理該問題仍為未來造林政策之重點；(4)造林獎勵政策中宜取消輪伐期之規範，而獎勵樹種規範則應予以保留；(5)對已成林獎勵的作法漸受各界重視，政府應積極研擬相關措施；(6)全民造林之造林獎勵方式亦不應完全廢止，惟獎勵金額與獎勵年限應審慎規劃；(7)林業界與環保界追求的目標一致，但對做法仍有歧見，應多進行溝通與互動。

關鍵字

造林政策 ； 林業政策 ； 山坡地超限利用

並列摘要

We evaluate the results of the implementation of the Reforestation Policy from 1997 to 2004 and also evaluate whether this policy achieved the policy objectives. We also analyze the issue that after the termination of the Reforestation Policy, how to reforest in the slopeland area and whether a new reforestation policy is still needed, and how to design a more suitable reforestation policy to make reforestation more efficient. We also conduct a survey to illicit information on concerned issues from government officials and academics related to forestry, and also from environmental conservationists. Based on the analysis of the survey results, the policy recommendations are made as follows:(1) After the termination of Reforestation Policy, a new reforestation policy is still needed; (2) The new reforestation policy should take into account the different natural and social conditions in different areas; (3) Solving the problems of over-capacity uses of slopeland should be still considered as an important objective of the new policy; (4) In the new reforestation policy, the regulations on forest rotation should be abolished and on the kinds of trees reforested should be maintained; (5) The issue of providing subsidy to the matured forestland is gaining more support, the government should start designing the related policy measures; (6) The subsidy design of the original reforestation policy should not be totally abolished, however, the amount and duration of subsidy should be carefully examined and evaluated; (7) The forestry secotor and environmental conservationists are sharing the same objective, only different on the ways to achieve the objective, both sides therefore should be engaged in more intensive interaction and communication in the future.

並列關鍵字

Afforestation and reforestation policy ； Forestry policy ； Over-capacity use of slopeland