參考文獻
Kellert, S., Longino, H., & Waters, C. K. (Eds.). (2006). Scientific Pluralism. Minnesota Studies in the Philosophy of Science (Vol. XIX). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
延伸閱讀
- 李維倫（2021）。書評回應－論述作為倫理行動。考古人類學刊，(95)，221-223。https://doi.org/10.6152/jaa.202112_(95).0011
- 朱家安（2011）。操弄論證及其回應：一個相容論者的新方案〔碩士論文，國立中正大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://www.airitilibrary.com/Article/Detail?DocID=U0033-2110201613494381
- 莫大華（2000）。治絲愈棼的國際關係理論研究對黃旻華先生的評論之回應。問題與研究，39(11)，95-101。https://doi.org/10.30390/ISC.200011_39(11).0005
- Haglid, K. G., Rosengren, L. E., & Karlsson, J. E. (1990). Authors' Reply. Scandinavian Journal of Work, Environment & Health, 16(2), 145-146. https://www.airitilibrary.com/Article/Detail?DocID=03553140-199003-201011180055-201011180055-145-146
- Verbeek, J., Dijk, F. V., Malmivaara, A., Hulshof, C., Räsänen, K., Kankaanpää, E., & Mukala, K. (2002). Authors' Reply. Scandinavian Journal of Work, Environment & Health, 28(5), 359-360. https://www.airitilibrary.com/Article/Detail?DocID=03553140-200209-201011100035-201011100035-359-360