課室目標線索與個人目標導向對國小學童解題成就及自我調整學習之交互效果

The Interaction Effects between the Cues of Classroom Goal and Personal Goal Orientations on Solving Mathematics Problems and Self-Regulated Learning

林易慧(Yi-Hui Lin) ； 程炳林(Biing-Lin Cherng)

《教育心理學報》 37卷3期 (2006/03) Pp. 231-255

https://doi.org/10.6251/BEP.20051209

摘要

本研究之目的在整合成就目標理論之情境與個人層面兩大研究取向，依據最近動機測量的情境特定觀點，採調節取向與多重目標設計，探討課室目標線索與個人目標導向對學習者解題成就及自我調整學習之交互影響。本研究採3（課室目標線索）×3（個人目標導向）×3（測量階段）受試者間受試者內混合實驗設計，藉由教導小六學童「由左到右」乘法解題技巧這項特定學習工作以進行課室目標線索操弄。受試者是台南縣市366名小六學童，實驗過程採小組進行。研究結果顯示：（一）在解題成就上，接受多重課室目標線索操弄者，其延後測得分顯著高於接受趨向精熟課室目標線索操弄者。（二）在自我調整學習方面，接受趨向表現課室目標線索操弄之精熟目標組的認知處理策略得分下滑，但趨向表現目標組得分卻提高；精熟目標組與多重目標組之後設認知策略得分均高於趨向表現目標組；接受趨向表現課室目標線索及多重課室目標線索操弄者，其主觀能力之得分均隨時間增加而提高；三個測量階段均顯示精熟目標組與多重目標組之工作價值得分高於趨向表現目標組、持多重目標者之工作價值隨時間下降，但持趨向表現目標者卻隨時間提高；精熟目標組與多重目標組的努力堅持得分均高於趨向表現目標組，但無論持何種目標，其努力堅持得分均隨時間而下降；三個測量階段均顯示精熟目標組與多重目標組之工作選擇得分高於趨向表現目標組。本研究根據研究結果進行討論，並提出未來研究之建議。

關鍵字

課室目標線索 ； 個人目標導向 ； 多重目標 ； 解題成就 ； 自我調整學習 ； 國小學童

並列摘要

The study attempted to integrate the contextual and individual approaches in achievement goal theory. The researchers adopted the view of situation-specific motivation assessments and the concept of moderated effect and multiple goals. The aim of this study was to explore the interaction effect between the cues of classroom goal and individual goal orientation on mathematics problem solving and self-regulated learning. A 3 (the cues of classroom goal) × 3 (personal goal orientation) × 3 (measurement occasion) mixed design was used. A total of 366 sixth-grade students were divided into several groups and were taught ”left-to-right” multiplication solving skills. The following results were obtained: In mathematics problem solving, students operating under the cues of multiple classroom goals scored much higher on delayed post-test than those under the cues of approach-performance classroom goal. In self-regulated learning, (a) the mastery goal group under the cues of approach-performance classroom goal showed a trend of decrease in cognitive processing strategy, whereas the group of approach-performance goal improved; (b) the groups of mastery goal and multiple goals both scored higher than approach-performance group in metacognition; (c) the students operating under the cues of approach-performance and multiple classroom goals were making progress along with time in subjective ability; (d) groups of mastery goal and multiple goals both scored higher than approach-performance in task values on three measurement occasions; however, the group of multiple goals regressed with time while the group of approach-performance goal progressed; (e) the groups of mastery goals and multiple goals both scored higher than approach-performance goal group in effort and persistence, but all regressed along with time; (f) the groups of mastery goal and multiple goals both scored higher than approach-performance group in task choice on three measurement occasions. Based on the findings, further discussions were made. Implications for elementary school education and suggestions for future studies were also presented.

並列關鍵字

the cues of classroom goal ； individual goal orientation ； achievement of solving mathematics problems ； self-regulated learning ； elementary school students

參考文獻

毛國楠、程炳林(1993)。目標層次與目標導向對大學生自我調整學習歷程之影響。教育心理學報。26，85-106。

林清山、程炳林(1996)。國中生自我調整因素與學習表現之關係暨自我調整的閱讀理解教學策略效果之研究。教育心理學報。28，15-58。

林啟超、謝智玲(2001)。高職學生之目標取向對學習策略與學習成就之關係研究。測驗統計年刊。9，131-168。

侯玫如、程炳林、于富雲(2004)。國中生多重目標導向與其自我調整學習之關係。教育心理學報。3，221-248。

施淑慎()。