透過您的圖書館登入
IP:3.16.83.150
  • 期刊

No Blood Means Less Harm?: Relational Aggression and Peer Rejection in Adolescence

青少年之關係攻擊與同儕拒絕

摘要


在校園生活中,外顯肢體攻擊行爲所造成的生理傷害常引起師長注意,而另種隱匿的攻擊現象也非常需要重視,亦即,以破壞他人的人際關係或社交名望爲目的之關係攻擊。本研究針對青少年在關係攻擊與外顯攻擊的性別差異進行分析,以瞭解關係攻擊之現況,並探討關係攻擊與同儕拒絕的相關。研究參與者爲大台北地區13個國中之62個班級的2211位國中生(1127位男生、1084位女生)。以同儕提名的方式,請參與者針對每道題目分別列出自己班上的三位同學,藉以收集每位學生在「攻擊行爲」與「社交地位」的分數;所得分數經標準化成Z分數,再進行統計分析。結果發現女生之關係攻擊分數顯著高於男生,而男生之外顯攻擊分數顯著高於女生;外顯攻擊者中95%爲男生,關係攻擊者中則有83%爲女生;關係攻擊與外顯攻擊皆能預測青少年的同儕拒絕;社交地位中之受爭議者的關係攻擊高於其他類型。即,關係攻擊相對是女性青少年較常使用之攻擊方式,且青少年之關係攻擊與其受同儕拒絕的情況有關。

並列摘要


The purpose of this study was to explore gender differences in the forms of aggression experienced by and perpetrated on Taiwanese adolescents, and to examine the relationship between aggression and peer rejection during adolescence. The participants consisted of 2211 adolescents (1127 boys and 1084 girls) from 62 classrooms of 13 junior high schools in Taipei area. A peer nomination procedure was used to obtain each participant’s aggression scores and sociometric status. The number of nominations received for each item was further standardized within each classroom and used for further analyses. The findings show a gender effect in two forms of aggression-relational and overt aggression: (1) Girls were significantly more relationally aggressive than boys, whereas boys were significantly more overtly aggressive than girls; and (2) Ninety-five percent of adolescents in the overt-aggression group were boys and eighty-three percent of adolescents in the relational-aggression group were girls. The results also demonstrated that both relational and overt aggression were predictive of concurrent peer rejection in this sample of adolescents. Relational aggression was the highest in adolescents of controversial status than in all the other groups (i.e., rejected, average, popular, neglected). Thus, the study demonstrates that relational aggression is favored by female adolescents and it is a salient factor of peer rejection.

參考文獻


Andreou, E.(2006).Social preference, perceived popularity and social intelligence: Relations to overt and relational aggression.School Psychology International.27(3),339-351.
Archer, J.(2001).A strategic approach to aggression.Social Development.10,267-271.
Archer, J.(2004).Sex differences in aggression in real-world settings: A meta-analytic review.Review of General Psychology.8,291-322.
Archer, J.,Coyne, S. M.(2005).An integrated review of indirect, relational, and social aggression.Personality and Social Psychology Review.9(3),212-230.
Baumeister, R. F.,Sommer, K. L.(1997).What do men want? Gender differences and two spheres of belongingness.Psychological Bulletin.122,38-44.

被引用紀錄


黃培淇(2020)。在辨識與介入之間:國中教師知覺學生關係霸凌之內在經驗探究〔碩士論文,淡江大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://doi.org/10.6846/TKU.2020.00362
陳怡萱(2018)。「當心,教室裡無聲的惡魔!」 關係霸凌因應策略之回溯研究〔碩士論文,中原大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://doi.org/10.6840/cycu201800115
邱亮儒(2013)。性別、性別角色意識以及性別特質對攻擊行為的影響-以國中生與大學生為例〔碩士論文,中山醫學大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://doi.org/10.6834/CSMU.2013.00118
姜延蓉(2017)。少年時期曾受關係霸凌者之因應與復原歷程〔碩士論文,國立臺灣大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://doi.org/10.6342/NTU201703464
王明傳(2010)。青少年前期兒童的同儕間接攻擊之受害經驗與反應評鑑〔博士論文,國立臺灣大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://doi.org/10.6342/NTU.2010.00128

延伸閱讀