透過您的圖書館登入
IP:18.216.121.55
  • 期刊

對的風格遇上對的人,謂之創意-人格特質、認知風格與兩類創造力之關係探討

How creative you will be depends on who you are: The relationship between personality traits, cognitive styles and different types of creativity

摘要


過去在創造力的個別差異研究裡,少有實徵研究同時探究人格特質和認知風格對創造力的影響;此外,過去相關研究也常將不同類型的創造力作業混為一談。根據創造力的雙系統論(Lin & Lien,2013a)和雙重認知風格理論(Sadler-Smith, 2009),經驗式的認知風格與開放式的創造力有關;封閉式的創造力則涉及理性、經驗兼併的通用型認知風格。據此,本研究即區分兩類創造力(開放式/封閉式),並同時探討創造性人格特質和認知風格在兩類創造力中扮演的角色。結果發現,創造性人格特質與兩類創造力表現皆有正相關,但不同的認知風格對兩類創造力表現的關係不同。進一步分析發現,人格特質對兩類創造力作業表現的正向效果,會受到不同認知風格的影響,人格特質透過通用認知風格的中介影響封閉式創造力的表現;而開放式創造力則較受經驗認知風格影響,其中在流暢力指標裡,經驗認知風格更扮演了中介的角色。本研究結果有助於釐清人格特質、認知風格與創造力的關係,對於創意應用或教學亦具實質的意義與幫助。

並列摘要


Past studies on individual differences in creativity rarely explored empirically the joint effect of personality traits and cognitive styles on creativity. Moreover, past studies often mixed different types of creative performance. According to the dual process account of creativity theory (Lin & Lien, 2013) and the duplex model of cognitive style theory (Sadler-Smith, 2009), experiential cognitive style may be associated with open-ended creativity; whereas closed-ended creativity may involve versatile cognitive style that combines experiential and rational cognitive styles. This study aimed to separate two types of creativity (open-ended and closed-ended) and investigate the role of personality traits and cognitive styles on the two types of creativity. The results showed that creative personality traits were positively correlated with both types of creativity, but different cognitive styles had different relationships with different types of creativity. Further analyses revealed that versatile cognitive style played a mediating role only on the relationship between personality traits and closed-ended creativity, but not on the relationship between personality traits and open-ended creativity. Open-ended creativity was instead more associated with experiential cognitive style. In particular, experiential cognitive style mediated the relationship between personality traits and fluency. These results clarify the relationships between personality traits, cognitive styles, and creativity, and have implication on teaching and creativity applications.

參考文獻


吳靜吉()。,未出版。
李穎涵(2013)。如何產生創意的假設?探討在規則發現作業中影響新角度假設產生的因素。佛光大學心理研究所=Fo Guang University。
林緯倫、連韻文、任純慧(2005)。想得多是想得好的前提嗎?探討發散性思考能力在創造力問題解決的角色。中華心理學刊。47,211-227。
陳柏宏(2010)。心理距離對超自然現象信念之影響:理性─經驗系統的調節效果。國防大學心理與社工學系研究所=National Defense University。
黃博聖、陳學志、劉政宏(2012)。「中文詞彙遠距聯想測驗」之編製及其信、效度報告。測驗學刊。59(4),581-607。

被引用紀錄


邱發忠(2022)。執行自我控制活動與自我控制特質交互作用對聚斂性與擴散性思考的效果教育心理學報53(4),901-921。https://doi.org/10.6251/BEP.202206_53(4).0006
張之倢、林緯倫、高詩姮(2023)。國英雙語平衡程度對臺灣大學生執行功能與兩類創造力表現的影響教育科學研究期刊68(4),191-225。https://doi.org/10.6209/JORIES.202312_68(4).0007
陳姵臻、黃博聖、陳學志、林緯倫(2020)。青少年封閉式創造力潛能測量:「青少年版中文詞彙遠距聯想測驗」之編製及信、效度研究測驗學刊67(3),167-190。https://www.airitilibrary.com/Article/Detail?DocID=16094905-202009-202010220006-202010220006-167-190
陳姵臻、吳清麟、張雨霖、黃博聖、林緯倫、陳學志(2021)。中文版遠距聯想測驗在創造力研究之應用:回顧與展望教育實踐與研究34(1),1-44。https://www.airitilibrary.com/Article/Detail?DocID=19935633-202106-202107220013-202107220013-1-44

延伸閱讀