透過您的圖書館登入
IP:3.145.163.58
  • 期刊

教師教學情緒、學生學業情緒與動機涉入之關係探究

The Relations of Teachers' Teaching Emotion, Students' Achievement Emotion, and Students' Motivational Engagement for Junior High School Students

摘要


教師教學情緒在學生學習歷程中扮演重要角色,然而在當代教育心理學中,相較於學生學業情緒的研究,較少關注教師教學情緒。因此,本研究建構「教師教學情緒二階驗證性因素分析模式」針對教師教學情緒分類架構作探討,以及建構「教學情緒、學業情緒與動機涉入之關係模式」,分析教學情緒、學業情緒與動機涉入之關係。本研究抽取二批國二學生為樣本,共1083 人,以結構方程模式進行分析。研究結果顯示:(1)本研究建構的「教師教學情緒二階驗證性因素分析模式」、「教學情緒、學業情緒與動機涉入之關係模式」皆與觀察資料適配;(2)教師正向教學情緒正向預測學生正向學業情緒;教師負向教學情緒正向預測學生負向學業情緒;(3)學生正向學業情緒正向預測適應性動機涉入;學生負向學業情緒正向預測不適應性動機涉入。本研究根據研究結果在理論及實務上的涵義進行討論,並提出未來的建議。

並列摘要


Teachers’ teaching emotions play a significant role in students' learning processes. Compared with students’ achievement emotions, there is less focus on teachers’ teaching emotions in the current field of study in psychology. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to construct a second order confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) model of teachers' teaching emotions and a model of teaching emotions, achievement emotions, and motivational engagement to test how the two models fit with observed data and analyze the relationships among teachers' teaching emotions, students' achievement emotions, and students' motivational engagement. The participants were 1,083 junior high school students. Structural equation modeling was used to obtain the following results: (a) the second order CFA model of teachers' teaching emotions fit the observed data well, (b) the model of teaching emotions, achievement emotions, and motivational engagement fit the observed data well, (c) teachers' positive teaching emotions positively predicted students' positive achievement emotions; teachers' negative teaching emotions positively predicted students' negative achievement emotions, and (d) students' positive achievement emotions positively predicted adaptive motivational engagement; students' negative achievement emotions positively predicted maladaptive motivational engagement. Based on the findings in this research, implications for theory, practice, and further research were discussed.

參考文獻


李俊青(2007)。學業情緒歷程模式之分析。國立成功大學教育研究所=National Cheng Kung University。
林宴瑛、程炳林(2012)。環境目標結構與控制─價值信念對學業情緒之效果。教育心理學報。44(1),49-72。
孫俊傑、龔心怡(2010)。國民中學兼任行政職務教師情緒勞務、教師自我效能與學校效能關係之研究。彰化師大教育學報。99(18),29-62。
陳正昌、程炳林、陳新豐、劉子鍵(2011)。多變量分析方法─統計軟體應用。台北=Taipei, Taiwan:五南=Wu Nan。
陳信憲、許銘珊(2011)。大專校院教師情緒勞務與工作倦怠之相關研究。高雄師大學報。30,1-15。

被引用紀錄


陳美如、曾子沁(2023)。運用心理位移書寫探討教師的位格特性與情緒調節教育心理學報55(2),211-239。https://doi.org/10.6251/BEP.202312_55(2).0001
張映芬(2021)。情緒勞務策略組型及其與相關因素之關係:質、量觀點的個人中心分析教育心理學報52(3),595-617。https://doi.org/10.6251/BEP.202103_52(3).0005
彭淑玲、程炳林(2023)。控制—價值評估互動對愉悅/無聊情緒與動機涉入之效果教育科學研究期刊68(4),1-33。https://doi.org/10.6209/JORIES.202312_68(4).0001
張映芬(2022)。三向度自我對待策略之建構暨其與完美主義、學業/社交焦慮之關係教育科學研究期刊67(1),193-225。https://doi.org/10.6209/JORIES.202203_67(1).0007
柯華葳(2019)。以學與教為經為緯的教育心理學中華心理學刊61(4),417-438。https://doi.org/10.6129/CJP.201912_61(4).0008

延伸閱讀