透過您的圖書館登入
IP:18.117.189.91
  • 期刊

簡版社交技巧提升系統青少年評量表的信度與效度研究

Reliability and Validity of the Short-form Chinese-version Social Skills Improvement System Rating Scales for Adolescent Students

摘要


本研究主要目的在檢驗簡版社交技巧提升系統青少年學生評量表的信度與效度,該評量表包含社交技巧測驗與行為問題兩項測驗,共40道問題。研究樣本為1031名七年級至十二年級學生(男生515人,女生516人,平均年齡為15.58歲,標準差1.75歲),以青少年社會行為評量表學生版為研究工具,使用AMOS 20.0統計軟體進行驗證性因素分析。研究結果顯示本研究簡版量表具有信度與效度,在信度方面,社交技巧各分測驗的α值介於 .74至 .84,重測信度則介於 .67至 .85;行為問題各分測驗的α值介於 .70至 .74,重測信度則介於 .70至 .76;驗證性因素分析結果顯示假設模式有良好的適配度,意謂社交技巧測驗與行為問題測驗的理論架構受到實證資料的支持;此外,社交技巧測驗得分與青少年社會行為評量表的適應性行為測驗得分有顯著正相關,行為問題測驗得分與青少年社會行為評量表的不適應行為測驗得分也有顯著正相關;比較簡版和原版在高風險學生分類的結果,兩者間的一致性也很高。

並列摘要


This study examined the reliability and validity of the short-form Chinese version of the Social Skills Improvement System-Rating Scales (SSIS-RS) for adolescent students; SSIS-RS comprises two scales, each assessing social skills and problem behaviors. The research sample consisted of 1031 grade 7-12 students [515 boys and 516 girls; mean (standard deviation) age = 15.58 (1.75) years]. The Adolescent Social Behavior Scale Student Form was also applied; moreover, AMOS (version 20.0) was used for confirmatory factor analysis (CFA). The Cronbach's alpha and test-retest reliability values were respectively .74- .84 and .67- .85 for the social skill subscales and .70- .74 and .70- .76 for the problem behavior subscales. The CFA results revealed that the theoretical models presented good model fit, suggesting that the empirical data supported the hypothesized theoretical frameworks of the social skill and problem behavior scales. The social skills and problem behavior scale scores strongly correlated with the scores of the adaptive and maladaptive behavior scales of the Adolescent Social Behavior Scale Student Form, respectively. Moreover, the observed classification consistency was high between the original and the short-form version of the Chinese SSIS-RS for the current adolescent students. Taken together, the current results demonstrate good reliability and validity of the short-form Chinese version of SSIS-RS in adolescent students.

參考文獻


王天苗、蘇建文、廖華芳、林麗英、鄒國蘇、林世華(1998):嬰幼兒綜合發展測驗編製報告。測驗年刊,45,19-46。[Wang, T.-M., Su, C.-W., Liao, H.-F., Lin, L.-Y., Chou, K.-S., & Lin, S.-H. (1998). The standardization of the Comprehensive Developmental Inventory for Infants and Toddlers. Psychological Testing, 45, 19-46.]
林怡君、沈慶盈(2013):人際發展介入團體對弱勢兒童同儕關係影響之研究-以南投縣課後照顧服務為例。臺灣社會工作學刊,12,1-35。[Lin, I.-C., & Shen, C.-Y. (2013). The effects of RDI on peer relationships of the children from disadvantaged families in after-school programs in Nantou. Taiwanese Social Work, 12, 1-35.]
林淑莉(2006):主題活動搭配社會性故事及錄影帶回饋之社交技巧教學方案對中重度智能障礙學生社交互動行為的影響。特殊教育學報,23,55-83。[Lin, S.-L. (2006). Thematic activities, social stories, and videotape feedback: Effects on social interaction behaviors of students with moderate/severe mental retardation. Journal of Special Education, 23, 55-83.]
邱皓政(2011):量化研究與統計分析。五南。[Chiou, H.-J. (2011). Quantitative research and statistical analysis. Wu-nan Book Inc.]
孟瑛如(2004):國民中小學社交技巧行為與特徵檢核表。心理。[Meng, Y.-R. (2004). The Social Skills and Behavior Checklist for Primary and Junior High School Students. Psychological Publisher.]

被引用紀錄


黃淑滿、周麗端、吳宗仁、葉明芬(2023)。手足重要?同儕重要?獨生與有手足幼兒社會能力成長軌跡與其同儕影響分析教育心理學報54(3),609-635。https://doi.org/10.6251/BEP.202303_54(3).0005
陳俊瑋(2022)。「中文版俄亥俄州教師效能感量表」於國小教師之驗證性研究教育心理學報53(4),853-878。https://doi.org/10.6251/BEP.202206_53(4).0004

延伸閱讀