青少年知覺的社會支持和英文科學業成就之關係：恆毅力與學習投入之序列中介效果分析

Relationship Between Perceived Social Support and English Academic Achievement Among Adolescents: The Sequentially Mediating Effects of Grit and Learning Engagement

陳思親(Sz-Chin Chen) ； 陳慧娟(Huey-Jiuan Chen)

《教育心理學報》 52卷4期 (2021/06) Pp. 857-883

https://doi.org/10.6251/BEP.202106_52(4).0006

摘要

本研究旨在探討後期中等教育階段青少年社會支持與英文學業成就之關係，並檢視恆毅力和學習投入的中介效果。調查方式採分層便利取樣，參與者為850位臺灣公、私立高中、高職學生，其中男生301人、女生549人。研究工具包含「社會支持量表」、「學習投入量表」、「恆毅力量表」和「英文科成就測驗」。所得資料以描述性統計和變異數分析檢視各向度之現況，並以皮爾森積差相關分析和中介效果分析考驗變項間之關係和序列中介效果。主要研究發現如下：（1）高中生學習投入程度、恆毅力得分，以及知覺的教師支持顯著高於高職生；（2）十年級學生自陳之學習投入程度與知覺的家長支持顯著高於十一年級學生；（3）青少男學習不熱衷程度顯著高於青少女；（4）青少女較青少男顯著感受到更多的同儕支持；（5）青少年社會支持、恆毅力、學習投入和英文科學業成就間彼此呈顯著正相關，而社會支持、恆毅力和英文科學業成就與學習不熱衷呈顯著負相關；（6）家長、教師、同儕和整體社會支持皆對英文科學業成就有正向影響；（7）恆毅力、學習投入序列中介社會支持對英文科學業成就的影響；（8）恆毅力、學習不熱衷依序正向、負向中介社會支持對英文科學業成就的影響。本研究依據上述結果提出建議，以供教育實務單位和未來研究之參考。

關鍵字

社會支持 ； 恆毅力 ； 學習投入 ； 英文科學業成就

並列摘要

In light of the crucial role of adolescence as a transitional stage of physical and psychological development and concerns regarding school learning during this time, educators have devoted their efforts to exploring the factors affecting adolescent development. Among all of the contextual factors, social support has been proven to promote students' development and academic achievement (Vollet et al., 2017; Wang et al., 2011). Several researchers have further indicated that social support from different sources offers unique contributions (Song et al., 2015; Wentzel et al., 2016) and may offset each other in some circumstances (Chen & Chien, 2020). Therefore, this research, which is based on Bronfenbrenner's ecological systems theory, both separately and collectively considers parent, teacher, and peer support to provide additional empirical evidence of the relationship between social support and academic achievement. In addition to academic achievement, engagement has been considered the core element of motivation, which represents the quality of students' participation (Skinner et al., 2009). Compared with academic achievement, learning engagement places more emphasis on the learning process, which encompasses students' behavioral, cognitive, emotional, and agentic involvement (Fredricks et al., 2004; Reeve & Teng, 2011). Instead of disengagement, Skinner and his colleagues (2008) highlighted disaffection, which involves the maladaptive motivational states of learning. Numerous studies have suggested that engagement is associated not only with learning achievement but also with physical and mental health (Jang et al., 2016). More importantly, researchers have indicated that learning engagement and disaffection are not innate but rather the product of personal traits and contextual factors (Buhs et al., 2018), which implies that potential for academic success is potentially malleable. Thus, the current study suggests that students' engagement can be increased through social support, which can also reduce disaffection, and that academic achievement is positively related to engagement and negatively related to disaffection. Recently, ＂grit＂ has emerged as a significant predictor of success (Duckworth et al., 2007). Although certain educational policies that have been implemented have included teaching methods for promoting the development of students' grit, whether grit predicts academic achievement remains unclear. Several studies have indicated that grit reduces the risk of disaffection and effectively improves academic achievement (Datu et al., 2016a), whereas other studies have indicated that grit has little explanatory power in terms of academic achievement (Steinmayr et al., 2018). Several researchers have suggested that this difference may be caused by the perception of grit as either domain general or domain specific (Muenks et al., 2017). Duckworth (2016) elaborated that having grit implies not a dedication to all scopes of knowledge and activity but rather a focus on a particular long-term goal that a person has a passion for. Thus, the current study adopted the domain-specific perspective with the aim of clarifying the relationship among social support, grit, engagement, and academic achievement. In the current study, we explored the relationship between social support and English academic achievement among adolescents in upper secondary education and examined the mediating effects of grit and learning engagement. Hence, in terms of adolescents' prior English achievement in the Comprehensive Assessment Program for junior high school students (the entrance exam for senior high school in Taiwan), we explored the sequentially mediating effects of grit and learning engagement-disaffection on perceived social support and English academic achievement, respectively. On the basis of the theoretical framework, the current study was designed to achieve the following aims: (1) clarify the current status of adolescents' perceived social support, grit, learning engagement-disaffection, and English academic achievement and determine whether sex, school type (vocational-high school), or grade (freshman-junior) affects any of the aforementioned variables; (2) explore the relationship among social support, grit, learning engagement-disaffection, and English academic achievement among adolescents; and (3) examine the sequentially mediating effect of grit and learning engagement-disaffection on perceived social support and English academic achievement in terms of prior English academic achievement. Through stratified convenience sampling, 850 students (301 male and 549 female) were recruited from senior high schools and vocational schools in Taiwan. All participants completed the revised Social Support Scale, the Learning Engagement Scale, the Grit Scale, and an original English achievement test. We quantitatively analyzed the data using descriptive statistics, analysis of variance, Pearson correlation analysis, and sequential mediation analysis. The results indicated the following: (1) senior high school students exhibit significantly higher learning engagement, have higher levels of grit, and perceive higher levels of teacher support than do vocational school students. (2) Freshmen (tenth graders) are significantly more engaged in learning and perceive significantly more parental support than do junior students (eleventh graders). (3) Male students are significantly more disaffected in learning than female students are. (4) Female students perceive significantly more peer support than male students do. (5) Social support, grit, engagement, and English academic achievement among teenagers are positively correlated with one another, whereas disaffection is negatively correlated with social support, grit, and English academic achievement. (6) Parental, teacher, peer, and overall social support have positive effects on English academic achievement. (7) Grit and engagement have sequential mediation effects on social support and English academic achievement. (8) Grit and disaffection sequentially mediate the relationship between social support and English academic achievement both positively and negatively. On the basis of these findings, the current study provides suggestions for educational practitioners and offers directions for future research. The findings of this study reveal the importance of parents, teachers, and peers in collaboratively building a positive learning environment to support adolescents' development. Moreover, because of the crucial role of grit in adolescents' learning, fostering grit to increase learning engagement and reduce learning disaffection is key for adolescents. In addition, both engagement and disaffection warrant attention. In this study, most adolescents exhibited a high level of agentic disaffection; these passive learners urgently require more attention. Furthermore, this study confirmed that support from different sources provides unique contributions. Support from parents and teachers affects adolescents' learning engagement and disaffection more significantly than other types of support do. The results indicated that support from older people plays an essential role in adolescents' development. In future studies, the distinctiveness of the participants' microsystem should be considered; accordingly, instruments should be properly modified to enhance construct validity. Although studies have primarily highlighted social support from parents, school teachers, and peers, several participants in our study indicated that they received more support from other family members, cram school teachers, or other peers. Moreover, assessment tools should correspond to participants and their living areas to ensure the value of the research. During adolescence, teenagers try to escape from parents' protection and strive for independence. Whether perceiving more social support might cause opposite outcomes and compromise students' self-identity is worthy of discussion. However, Datu and colleagues (2017) accounted for cultural differences, supplementing ＂adaptability to situations＂ as the third factor of grit. Future studies can modify their assessment tools according to these considerations and perform cross-cultural comparisons. Researchers can collect multiple types of data or long-term data to improve content validity and substantiate empirical evidence. Because this study adopted a self-report inventory, the data were vulnerable to personal response and social desirability bias. Although this study revealed a sequential mediation effect, the total effects were not substantial. Future studies can further explore other mediators to enrich theoretical knowledge on academic achievement and motivation theory. Upper secondary education is the first encounter that teenagers in Taiwan have with the decision-making aspects of different school systems. The study results indicated that vocational school students have lower levels of grit and engagement and lower English academic achievement than senior high school students do. We expect additional studies to examine the upper secondary education system to provide more practical advice.

並列關鍵字

social support ； grit ； learning engagement ； English academic achievement

參考文獻

林漢唐、陳慧娟（2016）：〈家長網路管教、學校投入與青少年危險網路行為之關係：家庭凝聚力之調節效果分析〉。《教育科學研究期刊》，61（4），205-242。[Lin, H.-T., & Chen, H.-J. (2016). Relationships between parental nternet intervention, school engagement, and risky online behaviors among adolescents: The moderatoring role of family cohesion. Journal of Research in Education Sciences, 61(4), 205-242.] https://doi.org/10.6209/JORIES.2016.61(4).08

陳慧娟、簡洧晴（2020）：〈大學生選課後悔與動機干擾研究：檢驗後悔因應策略的中介效果與社會支持的調節效果〉。《教育科學研究期刊》，65（2），277-312。[Chen, H.-J., & Chien, W.-C. (2020). Effect of regret on motivational interference among college students: Regret coping strategy as a mediator and social support as a moderator. Journal of Research in Education Sciences, 65(2), 277-312.] https://doi.org/10.6209/JORIES.202006_65(2).0010

DeGarmo, D. S., & Martinez, C. R. (2006). A culturally informed model of academic well‐being for Latino youth: The importance of discriminatory experiences and social support. Family Relations, 55(3), 267-278. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-3729.2006.00401.x

Doménech-Betoret F., Gómez-Artiga A., & Abellán-Roselló L. (2019). The educational situation quality model: A new tool to explain and improve academic achievement and course satisfaction. Academy of Management Learning & Education. 18(2), 128-152. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01692

Doll, W. J., Xia, W., & Torkzadeh, G. (1994). A confirmatory factor analysis of the end-user computing satisfaction instrument. MIS Quarterly, 18(4), 453-462. https://doi.org/10.2307/249524