都市綠地空間自然生態、景觀審美與地方依附之研究

在都市化發展模式上，都市空間之分割及內容多趨於機能考量而忽略了人性情感上及自然生態上之需求。都市綠地空間的破碎化及幾何化漸與自然背道而馳，而專家與一般民眾對於都市綠地空間的設計，在整齊規則與自然生態間的審美認知是否一致，一般民眾對於都市綠地空間的自然生態審美認知為何，皆是本研究想要了解與分析的問題。因此，本研究從文獻回顧中，利用都市綠地空間景觀生態審美評價矩陣之方法，界定四種景觀生態審美的類型，然後利用Raymond等人（2010）具有信度與效度之地方依附構面與量表來檢測不同類型景觀生態審美都市綠地空間之地方依附與景觀審美及偏好之間的關係。另外，分析不同社經背景及個人特質在地方依附、景觀審美評價及偏好上具有何種的差異。研究結果發現不同類型綠地空間在景觀生態審美評價、偏好與地方依附無顯著差異，受訪者對於低生態中美學的公園之審美評價比學者認為高生態高美學的公園還要高，表示受測者與專家之間的認知仍是存在著差異，地方依附會正向影響景觀生態審美評價及偏好，個人社經背景及個人特質在景觀生態審美評價、偏好及地方依附具有部分顯著差異。研究結果希望可以提供公部門及景觀設計者在都市空間進行景觀規劃設計時如何在自然生態與景觀審美取得平衡之參考。

關鍵字

景觀生態審美；綠色空間；地方依附

並列摘要

In the development model of urbanization, the division and content of urban spaces tend to be functional considerations while neglecting the needs of human emotion and natural ecology. The fragmentation and geometrization of urban green spaces have grown gradually and counteractively to nature. This research sought to understand and analyze whether experts and the public had the same aesthetic cognition of the formal style and the natural ecology in the design of urban green spaces. First, from the literature review, this study defined the four types of landscape ecological aesthetics of urban green spaces using the landscape ecological aesthetic evaluation matrix. It then examined the relationships among place attachment, landscape aesthetics, and preferences for urban green spaces . In addition, this study analyzed how differences in social and economic backgrounds and personal characteristics affected place attachment, landscape aesthetic evaluation, and preference. The results of the study showed that there were no significant differences in the landscape ecological aesthetic evaluation, preference, and place attachment for the different types of green spaces. Respondents' aesthetic evaluation of parks with low ecology and middle aesthetics was higher than that of parks with high ecology and high aesthetics, indicating that there were still differences in cognition between respondents and experts. Place attachment positively affected the aesthetic evaluation and preference of landscape ecology. Individual socioeconomic backgrounds and personal characteristics showed some significant influences on landscape ecological aesthetic evaluation, preference, and place attachment. The results of this study could be used by the public works department and landscape designers when considering how to balance natural ecology and landscape aesthetics in the planning and design of urban spaces.

並列關鍵字

Landscape ecological aesthetics ； Green space ； Place attachment

參考文獻

張伯茹、陳上迪(2019)。環境干擾對中高齡女性使用都市綠園道之戶外休閒、地方依附與幸福感之關係。戶外遊憩研究，32(2)，39-65。https://doi.org/10.6130/JORS.201906_32(2).0002 Chang, P. J., & Che, S. T. (2019). The effect of environmental stressors on the association between outdoor leisure, place attachment, and well-being in urban greenway among middle- aged and older women. Journal of Outdoor Recreation Study, 32(2), 39-65.

許嘉恩、洪立三(2015)。社區依附、環境態度與居民對於保護區的看法：以關渡自然公園為例。地理研究，62，91-108。https://doi.org/10.6234/JGR.2014.62.05 Sheu, J. E., & Hung, L. S. (2015). Community attachments, environmental attitude and local attitudes toward protected area: A study at Guandu Nature Park. Journal of Geographical Research, 62, 91-108.

郭蕙瑜、鄭佳昆、沈立(2013)。運用景觀元素探討生長經驗對延續地方連結之影響。建築學報，86，145-167。https://doi.org/10.6342/NTU.2012.01754 Kuo, H. Y., Cheng, C. K., & Shen, L. (2013). Explore the impact of growth experience on the continuity of place bonding through the use of landscape elements. Journal of Architecture, 86, 145-167.

陳寬裕、李仕琴、林士豐、林瓊芬(2012)。遊憩涉入、地方依附與社會情境之關係：以登山健行者為例。休閒觀光與運動健康學報，3(1)，110-125。https://doi.org/10.29504/JLTSH.201209.0006 Chen, K. Y., Lee, S. C., Lin, S. F., & Lin, C. F. (2012). A study on the relationship among hikers’ activity involvement, place attachment, and social condition. Journal of Leisure, Tourism, Sport, & Health, 3(1), 110-125.

陳棟樑、陳俐文、張心怡(2020)。地方依附、休閒涉入、滿意度對負責任環境行為之研究-以宜蘭縣羅東運動公園為例。觀光與休閒管理期刊，8，1-15。https://doi.org/10.6510/JTLM.202008/SP_8.0001 Chen, T. L., Chen, L. W., & Chang, H. Y. (2020). A study of place attachment, leisure involvement, satisfaction and responsible environmental behavior: The case of Luodong Sports Park in Yilan County. Journal of Tourism and Leisure Management, 8, 1-15.

主題瀏覽