透過您的圖書館登入
IP:3.15.38.243
  • 期刊

科技大學圖書館服務品質評量指標之分析

An Analysis for Library Service Quality Indices of Technological University

摘要


知識經濟時代的來臨使得大學圖書館扮演的角色日益重要,網際網路的興起與普及化,科技大學師生需要多樣化,快速檢索資訊與共同使用知識的便利,使得過去衡量圖書館服務的量表也顯得不適用。本研究主要目的是發展適合於網際網路時代的科技大學圖書館服務品質量表,參酌「服務滿意度」、「資訊服務品質」、「圖書館服務品質」等領域的相關文獻,修訂「圖書館服務品質量表之構面」,形成「人員服務」、「檢索系統易用性」、「館藏取得便利」、「檢索設備服務」、「電子期刊參考服務」、「館藏資源服務」等六個探索性因素構面,再以此六個因素構面為基礎,蒐集公、私立各一所科技大學圖書館使用者,回收共計469個有效樣本,進行統計上的驗證。本研究發展的量表工具在驗證性因素分析及模式交叉驗證中,皆均獲得良好的信度、效度,最後針對公私立科大的服務品質指標進行相互比較,並提出本研究限制及對後續研究與圖書館管理實務的若干建議。

並列摘要


Library plays an increasingly important role in the age of knowledge-based economy. With the prosperity of the Internet, technological university readers need variously and rapidly search information, conveniently retrieve various information and knowledge sharing facilities. Hence, current models for measuring service quality of library are perceived as inapplicable as they are targeted primarily towards traditional library contexts. The main purpose of this study is to develop a comprehensive model and instrument for measuring library service quality in the Internet context. This study reviews the literature relating to service satisfaction, information service quality and library service quality, then proposes six exploratory dimensions of library service, including person service, easeful retrieval systems, conveniently get information service, information retrieval facility service, electric journal reference service, and collecting resource service. Based on these six dimensions, collecting 469 valid samples from one public and one private technological universities construct a cross validity model for measuring technological university library service quality. Through exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis, evidence of reliability and validity of the proposed model is presented. Finally, we compare the library service quality indices of these technological universities conclude this study by discussing limitations and implications for research and management practice.

並列關鍵字

Service quality Library Cross validate

參考文獻


Ahire, S. L.,Golhar, D. Y.,Waller, M. A.(1996).Development and validation of TQM implementation constructs.Decision Sciences.27(1),23-56.
Andaleeb, Syed Saad,Simmonds, Patience L.(1998).Explaining User Satisfaction with Academic Libraries: Strategic Implications.College and Research Libraries.59,156-167.
Anderson, James C.(1987).An Approach for Confirmatory Measurement and Structural Equation Modeling of Organizational Properties.Management Science.33(4),525-541.
Anderson, James C.,Gerbing, David W.(1988).Structural Equation Modeling in Practice: A Review and Recommended Two-step Approach.Psychological Bulletin.103(3),411-423.
Richard P., Youjae Y., Y.(1988).On the Evaluation for Structural Equation Models.Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science.16(1),74-94.

被引用紀錄


陳建宏(2006)。技職院校服務品質對學生忠誠度因果模式發展之研究〔博士論文,國立臺灣師範大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://www.airitilibrary.com/Article/Detail?DocID=U0021-0712200716121740
趙素貞(2007)。大學圖書館NetLibrary電子書之使用效益分析〔碩士論文,國立臺灣師範大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://www.airitilibrary.com/Article/Detail?DocID=U0021-0204200815525426
陳政德(2009)。訓練機關服務品質、滿意度與忠誠度關係之研究-以國家文官培訓所為例〔碩士論文,國立臺北大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://www.airitilibrary.com/Article/Detail?DocID=U0023-1108200911592300
簡比倫(2013)。國立中正文化中心表演藝術圖書館服務滿意度調查〔碩士論文,國立臺灣師範大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://www.airitilibrary.com/Article/Detail?DocID=U0021-1610201315290676

延伸閱讀