揉合區域研究與學科導向的中國研究：以當代東亞所學術社群的英文著作為例

The China Studies that Melds Area Studies with Disciplinary Orientation:A Case Study of the English works by the Academic Community of the Contemporary Graduate Institute of East Asian Studies

蔡文軒(Tsai, Wen-Hsuan) ； 寇健文(Kou, Chien-Wen)

《東亞研究》 49卷2期 (2018/12) Pp. 53-82

https://doi.org/10.30402/EAS.201812_49(2).0003

摘要

政治大學東亞研究所建立於1968年。當時是在冷戰與兩岸對峙的格局下，台灣需要培養研析中國大陸情勢發展的專業人才，因此建立該所。1990年代冷戰結束，加上台灣高等教育環境改變，東亞所也因應大環境的變遷而調整走向。在過去五十年中，東亞所的中國研究揉合區域研究與學科導向。本文分析以東亞所學術社群在《The China Quarterly》、《The China Journal》與《Journal of Contemporary China》三份期刊發表的文章與其特色，並討論東亞所在學術發展上面臨的新挑戰。

關鍵字

東亞研究所 ； 政治大學 ； 中國大陸研究 ； 兩岸關係 ； 吳俊才

並列摘要

The Graduate Institute of East Asian Studies at Chengchi University was founded in 1986. As Mainland China posed a considerable threat to Taiwan in the Cold War, the government of Taiwan found it necessary to establish the institute for the cultivation of professionals able to compile and analyze information on Mainland China. After the end of the Cold War, the Institute of East Asian Studies began a shift toward scholarly research in response to both the cessation of these needs and changes in Taiwan's higher education. In the fifty years of its development, China studies at the institute have moved to and from area and discipline-based studies. This study aims to discuss the content and nature of academic papers submitted by the institute's academic community to three distinguished periodicals: The China Quarterly, the China Journal, and the Journal of Contemporary China. In addition, this study aims to discuss how the institute deals with challenges in its academic development.

並列關鍵字

China studies ； Graduate Institute of East Asian Studies ； sociology of knowledge ； area studies ； discipline-based research

參考文獻

新京報網，2018，〈改革開放四十年：我在中美學界架起一座橋樑〉，http://www.bjnews.com.cn/opinion/2018/08/20/500168.html ，查閱時間：2018/09/11。The Beijing News. 2018. “Gaige kaifang sishi nian: wo zai zhongmei xueijie jiaqi yizuo qiaoliang” [40 Years of Reform and Opening-Up: I Built a Bridge inside Chinese and American Academia]. (Accessed on September 11, 2018)

人民網，2010， 〈西方學者視野中的國外中國問題研究—— 訪美國喬治·華盛頓大學教授沈大偉〉，http://dangshi.people.com.cn/GB/138903/138911/11863217.html，查閱時間：2018/9/11。People’s Daily. 2010. “Xifang xuezhe shiye zhong de guowai zhongguo wenti yanjiu-fang meiguo qiaozhi huashendun daxue jiaoshou shen dawei” [China Studies from the Perspective of Western Scholars Overseas: an Interview with Professor David Shambaugh of George Washington University]. (Accessed on September 11, 2018)

王信賢，2000，〈當代西方「中國研究」之新制度典範分析〉，《中國大陸研究》，43（8）：44-45。Wang, Hsing-hsien. 2000. “Dangdai xifang ‘zhongguo yanjiu’ zhi xin zhidu dianfan fenxi” [An Analysis on the Neo-Institutionalist Paradigm of Contemporary Western China Studies]. Mainland China Studies 43 (8): 44-45.

李宗義、張弘遠、許雅淑，2011，〈社會學與中國研究：臺灣的位置（1955-2005）〉，《東亞研究》，44（1）：33-74。Lee, Tsung-yi, Hongy-uan Chang, and Ya-shu Hsu. 2011. “Shehuixue yu zhongguo yanjiu: Taiwan de weizhi (1995-2005)” [China Studies in Sociological Perspective: The Case of Taiwan (1955-2005)]. East Asia Studies 44 (1): 33-74.

寇健文，2010，〈中共菁英政治與質性分析：原始資料來源與分析方法〉，《臺灣政治學刊》，9（2）：233-278。 Kou, Chien-wen. 2010. “Zhonggong jingying zhengzhi yu zhixing fenxi: yuanshi ziliao laiyuan yu fenxi fangfa” [Chinese Elite Politics and Qualitative Analyses: Primary Data Sources and Analytical Methods]. Taiwanese Political Science Review 9 (2): 233-278.