透過您的圖書館登入
IP:3.131.110.169
  • 期刊

中國大陸鄉鎮人大改革的實驗-以浙江溫嶺市鄉鎮「民主懇談會」為例

The Experiment of "Democratic Consultation" Reform at the Township People's Congresses-A Case Study of Wenling City, Zhejiang, China

摘要


中國政治體制改革的努力方向之一是希望獎勵地方政府進行民主實驗,籍以體現公民的政治參與。「民主懇談會」的實驗在浙江省溫嶺市下轄的五鄉鎮中逐漸展開,此舉不僅引發中國大陸內部的重視,更引起西方學者的關注。1999年溫嶺市開始出現「民主懇談」活動,中國大陸政治學界開始從西方審議式民主的角度嘗試討論。不過,本文認為,從這個視野來討論民主懇談會恐會誤解,蓋因民主懇談其實屬於一種不涉及民主選舉的民意表達形式,或者就說它根本就不討論選舉與民主懇談的內在關係,試著找出一種沒有選舉的民主形式。 經過研究,本文有如下的初步結論,一、「民主懇談會」是從體制外的實驗走向體制內的連結,透過人大來進行改革;二、公共預算議題較具可操作性,預算審查程序漸具透明與公開的性質;三、民主懇談若能將人民的選舉權再進行制度稼接,人大代表會更有主動性。最後,民主懇談制度必須能擴散,並朝向嚴謹的監督制度邁進,否則終究只是曇花一現。

並列摘要


One of the PRC's political reform programs is to stimulate local governments to experiment democracy, through which the practices of civic political participation can be performed. Under such circumstances, the model of ”democratic consultation” within the live townships in Wenling City, Zhejiang Province forms a trend, which has attracted attention from domestic governments and international scholars. The form of ”democratic consultation” started in Wenling City in 1999. Since then, political scientists in China have studied it from the view of ”deliberative democracy”, a perspective from western studies. However, this article considers that such perspective would lead to a misunderstanding of ”democratic consultation”. The character of ”democratic consultation” is no more than an expression of opinion in which the direct elections have never blended in. That is to say, the ”democratic consultation” does not touch upon the relations of election and democracy; it is a democratic style without free election. In aspect to the political development in China, the authors conclude the following: (1) It may be time to experiment reform in the CCP; (2) public budgetary issue is more operational, and the process of budget review is more open and transparent; (3) the more promotion on democratic consultation is, the more active the local people's congresses will be; (4) the mode of ”democratic consultation” should be applied in other areas, and a rigid check and balance mechanism has to be maintained.

參考文獻


「李君如:中國政協制度與西方有很多相似之處 」,中國評論新聞,2008 年3月9日,http://www.chinareviewnews.com/doc/1005/8/7/5/100587544.html?coluid=45&kindid =0&docid=100587544&mdate=0309174601
Dryzek, John S. 、丁開杰譯 (2006)。協商民主及其超越:自由與批判的視角。北京:中央編譯出版社。
丁樹範主編(2002)。胡錦濤時代的挑戰。台北:新新聞。
Dryzek, John S. 、王大林 譯 (2005)。不同領域的協商民主。浙江大學學報 -人文社會科學版 (浙江 )。35(3),32。
D''Entreves, Maurizio Passerin、王英津 譯 (2006)。作為公共協商的民主:新的視角。北京:中央編譯出版社。

被引用紀錄


吳建忠(2011)。中國大陸鄉鎮人大改革的邏輯──以浙江溫嶺市新河鎮「參與式預算」為例〔博士論文,國立臺灣師範大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://www.airitilibrary.com/Article/Detail?DocID=U0021-1610201315233235

延伸閱讀