透過您的圖書館登入
IP:3.15.6.77
  • 期刊

大學生日常生活主觀經驗品質之探討:知覺的挑戰與技巧之效果分析

The Quality of Subjective Experience in Daily Lives of College Students: The Effect of Perceived Challenges and Skills

摘要


本研究旨在探討大學生在知覺高挑戰與高技巧的狀況下,主觀經驗的品質,以及在整體領域和各活動背景中,知覺的挑戰、技巧、及兩者的交互作用對主觀經驗的效果。本研究使用經驗取樣法測量101位大學生一週期間每天8次的生活經驗(共收集到5,640份反應資料)。研究結果顯示,大學生在知覺高挑戰與高技巧的狀況下,專注、控制、興趣及投入等經驗呈現高於平均狀況的正向品質。此外,階層線性模式分析結果顯示,整體而言,知覺的挑戰與技巧的交互作用對主觀經驗品質具有正向效果,然而在不同的活動背景中,知覺的挑戰與技巧對不同經驗所扮演的角色卻有所差異;對於大學生的主觀經驗,知覺的挑戰與技巧可以解釋個體之內11%-39%左右的變異。本研究結果對於提昇大學生日常生活經驗品質具有啟示,研究者最後針對心流模式提出討論,並對大學生的學習與輔導提出建議。

並列摘要


This study conducted two major examinations. First, the present study examined whether varying ratios of perceived challenge and skill can explain the range of negative to positive variations in daily experience. Second, the article investigated the effects that perceived challenges and skills in activities have on the quality of everyday life experience. The design of the study involved an experience sampling methodology; 101 college students completed experience surveys at eight times during the day for a period of one week, resulting in a total 5,640 observations. The experience surveys measure daily variations in five dimensions of experience (concentration, control, interest, enjoyment, and involvement) in four contexts. Findings showed that the quality of experience in high-challenge/high-skill conditions was characterized by high concentration, control, interest, and involvement of the situation. Results from hierarchical linear modeling analyses showed that prediction of flow theory that the interaction of challenges and skills has a positive effect on the quality of experience. Yet some differences of parameter estimates were found between dimensions of experience and between social contexts of activity. The perceived challenges, skills, and their interaction explained 11%-39% of the with-individual variance in dimensions of experience. These findings suggest implications for improving the quality of Taiwanese college students’ life and call for a further improvement of the flow model.

參考文獻


曾文志(2007)。大學生對美好生活的常識概念與主觀幸福感之研究。教育心理學報。38,417-441。
曾文志(2010)。大學生最佳經驗及相關情境與個體因素:微觀分析取向。教育與心理研究
Argyle, M.(1987).The psychology of happiness.London:Methuen.
Asakawa, K.(2004).Flow experience and autotelic personality in Japanese college students: How do they experience challenges in daily life?.Journal of Happiness Studies.5,123-154.
Benton, S. A.,Robertson, J, M.,Tseng, W. C.,Newton, F. B.,Benton, S. L.(2003).Changes in counseling center client problems across 13 years.Professional Psychology: Research and Practice.34,66-72.

被引用紀錄


陳柏霖(2022)。幸福感教學2.0融入正向園藝療育課程對學生心盛與幸福感之影響教育研究與發展期刊18(1),41-74。https://doi.org/10.6925/SCJ.202203_18(1).0002
徐昀(2015)。國小高年級學童課後活動主觀經驗分群與 生活品質:生物生態系統理論PPCT的應用〔碩士論文,國立交通大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://doi.org/10.6842/NCTU.2015.00587
陳翰均(2013)。場地特性、遊憩專門化與心流體驗之關聯性研究–以虎尾鎮網球俱樂部之運動參與者為例〔碩士論文,國立虎尾科技大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://doi.org/10.6827/NFU.2013.00133
吳曉菁(2023)。身心動作教育(SME)與舞蹈學生心流經驗之研究台灣舞蹈研究(18),83-120。https://doi.org/10.6303/TDRJ.202312_(18).0003
Cheng, C. Y. (2016). 學生在校與課後的最佳經驗:密集追蹤資料之變項與人群分析 [doctoral dissertation, National Chiao Tung University]. Airiti Library. https://www.airitilibrary.com/Article/Detail?DocID=U0030-0803201714332849

延伸閱讀