「大政治」及「未來哲學」的同一性－對尼采整體哲學的一個詮釋

Identity between the "Great Politics" and the "Philosophy of Future": An Interpretation of the Whole Philosophy of Nietzsche

李建漳(Chien-Chang Lee)

《臺大文史哲學報》 73期 (2010/11) Pp. 87-126

https://doi.org/10.6258/bcla.2010.73.04

摘要

我試圖用一個獨特的角度，對尼采哲學的整體作出一個詮釋：政治在尼采思想中佔據著什麼樣的地位？而我的假設及企圖證明的是：並沒有一個獨立的「尼采的政治哲學」，他的哲學，就是他的政治思想，因為在他對知識論及形上學的討論中，政治與存有者是同一的，政治是存有者必然的內在面向。因此，哲學與政治有同一性的關係，而這個同一性的完全展現，就是大政治與未來哲學。在此文，貫穿所有論證的是多元異質邏輯，只要實有是「多」或「差異」，政治面向就必然隱含其中，因為尼采始終以政治共同體之所以為一的方式來理解這個從多到一的過程。

關鍵字

尼采 ； 差異 ； 政治哲學 ； 知識論 ； 形上學

並列摘要

This paper attempted to explore into the whole philosophy of Nietzsche from a different perspective: the role of the politics in Nietzsch's thought. It proposed that there was an identity between the great politics and the philosophy of future. That is, in Nietzsche's world, via the analysis of his epistemology and his understanding of metaphysics, the politics was always a first and intrinsic determination if people tried to understand the reality by following Nietzsche's logic of diversity and plurality. Also, through the model of body, Nietzsche intended to prove that the organism was nothing more than a process of organization, simply like a political organization in particular. What Nietzsche tried to do, in fact, was the revolution, since he believed that the Being was political and the way that one thing became real would be conceived as a process of politics: a political organization or a fight of multiples forces.

並列關鍵字

Nietzsche ； difference ； political thought ； epistemology ； metaphysics

參考文獻

陳文團(1999)。未完成的計劃或破毀的哲學精神。哲學雜誌。29，136-161。

Ansell-Pearson, Keith(1994).An introduction to Nietzsche as political thinker: the perfect nihilist.Cambridge University Press.

Bataille, George(1945).Œuvres complètes.Paris:Gallimard.

Birault, Henri(2000).Lectures de Nietzsche.Paris:Librairie Gerenale Francaise.

Daniel, Conway(1997).Nietzsche & the political.London:Routledge.