透過您的圖書館登入
IP:18.216.220.21
  • 期刊
  • Ahead-of-Print

現存《元和三舍人集》相關問題考述

A Study of Yuanhe Sansheren Ji

本文正式版本已出版,請見:10.6258/bcla.2017.87.02

摘要


《元和三舍人集》過去以為未有傳本,故而相關研究不多,本文於前人基礎上,嘗試作進一步討論。全文首先為此集全書內容作一提要鈎陳並略加考述,包括原序作者時代,現存詩篇、詩題之正確數目、後世書目著錄並由此推測其流傳狀況;其次,釐清此集作品乃奉敕撰進的樂府聲詩,而非三位學士相互酬和之作;復次,則針對此集原題名稱問題作一辨析;最後,在上述梳理基礎上,進一步由翰林學士職能角度切入,析論此集所透顯、反映出的中唐翰林學士文學與政治上的雙重職能,藉此凸顯《元和三舍人集》作為一本中唐三位翰林學士所作詩集,其文學與政治上的可能意涵。

並列摘要


There are few studies about the Yuanhe Sansheren Ji (元和三舍人集) because it was thought to be lost. This article attempts to discuss four aspects of this compilation on the base of the previous studies. Firstly, I make a synopsis of the compilation including the time of the original preface, the correct amount of poems and titles, the records of this compilation through the history of its circulation and so on. Secondly, this article points out the poems in the compilation are Yuefu lyrics (樂府聲詩) for the emperor, not responsory poetry of three Hanlin academicians (翰林學士). Thirdly, I discuss the controversial title of this compilation. Fourthly, from the perspective of the Hanlin academicians, , it points out both the literary and political significance of the Yuanhe Sansheren Ji.

參考文獻


唐白居易、朱金城箋校(1988)。白居易集箋校。上海:上海古籍出版社。
唐李商隱、劉學鍇校注、余恕誠校注(2002)。李商隱文編年校注。北京:中華書局。
唐杜佑(1988)。通典。北京:中華書局。
唐杜甫、清仇兆鰲注(1980)。杜詩詳註。臺北:里仁書局。
唐杜牧、吳在慶校注(2008)。杜牧集繫年校注。北京:中華書局。

延伸閱讀