方東樹的理學觀及其宋學立場再探－以《跋南雷文定》為討論中心

Fang Dongshu's concept and standpoint of Neo-Confucianism in his Ba Nanlei Wending

何威萱(Ho, Wei-hsuan)

《臺大文史哲學報》 86期 (2017/05) Pp. 45-85

https://doi.org/10.6258/bcla.2017.86.02

摘要

方東樹《漢學商兌》為清代漢宋之爭之名著，然稍後著成之《跋南雷文定》更反映了方氏的理學觀、工夫觀、乃至於對宋明以來學術發展的理解與詮釋。簡言之，方氏之「心」、「意」關係回歸朱子，然以「意」為善去惡的念頭，「誠」則是決絕落實之的動力，道德意向濃厚。方氏更強調「慎獨」的「品節、限制」之義，工夫樣態嚴肅而惕厲。書中並確立以《大學》傳承為基礎的由孔子至曾子、程朱的道統，明儒與漢學考據皆為悖逆之異端。方氏更重新定義〈道學傳〉的內涵，使清初以來〈道學傳〉的取消，由原先對程朱的打擊一躍而化為對程朱的表彰，並成為其逐陸王心學、考證漢學於儒門正宗外之判教依據。這些都是《漢學商兌》中未曾見到、或尚未發展成熟的觀點。

關鍵字

方東樹 ； 跋南雷文定 ； 劉宗周 ； 理學 ； 道學傳

並列摘要

Fang Dongshu and his Hanxue Shangdui played an important role in the conflict of Hanxue (漢學) and Songxue (宋學) in the middle Ching. There were plenty of studies focused on his sharp reprimand and debate to the scholars of Hanxue displayed in Hanxue Shangdui. Nonetheless, his another book Ba Nanlei Wending included more abundant resources which could reflect his concept, theory of self-cultivation, and standpoint of Neo-Confucianism. In short, the exegesis of ＂mind (Xin)＂ and ＂will (Yi)＂ of Fang was strongly inclined to Zhuxi, though the interpretation of ＂sincerity (Chengyi)＂ was innovatively changed. Fang's concept of ＂vigilance in solitude (Shendu)＂ was transformed as a supplementary method of ＂chengyi＂, and the meaning of restriction was extraordinarily emphasized. The viewpoint of the development of Neo-Confucianism was also constructed in Ba Nanlei Wending, most prestigious scholars in the Ming dynasty and the middle Ching was regarded as heterodoxy. More over, Fang redefined the definition of ＂Neo-Confucianism biography (Daoxue Zhuan)＂ for the abrogation of it in History of Ming (Mingshi).

並列關鍵字

Fang Dongshu ； Ba Nanlei Wending ； Liu Zongzhou ； Neo-Confucianism ； Neo-Confucianism biography (Daoxue Zhuan)

參考文獻

林月惠，〈劉蕺山對《大學》〈誠意〉章的詮釋〉，《中國文哲研究集刊》第19期，2001年9月，頁407-450。

劉勇，〈中晚明時期的講學宗旨、《大學》文本與理學學說建構〉，《中央研究院歷史語言研究所集刊》第80本第3分，2009年9月，頁403-450。

田富美，〈方東樹儒學思想的一個側面──辨陸王以歸程朱〉，《成大中文學報》第40期，2013年3月，頁173-203。

宋‧王安石，《王臨川全集》，臺北：世界書局，2013。

宋‧朱熹，《四書集註》，臺北：世界書局，1997。