市區綠道路指標之準備程度與得分改善建議

THE READINESS AND SCORE IMPROVEMENT STRATEGY OF GREEN ROADWAYS INDICATORS

楊士賢(Shih-Hsien Yang) ； 陳若惟(Ruo-Wei Chen) ； 陳懷南(Hoai-Nam Tran)

《中國土木水利工程學刊》 34卷8期 (2022/12) Pp. 709-719

https://doi.org/10.6652/JoCICHE.202212_34(8).0006

摘要

營建署於2020年推出台灣市區綠道路評估系統（TUGR），其中包括生態、材料與能資源、廢棄物與污染、宜居性、社區與人文、經濟及其他創新等七類共25個永續指標，全方位評估道路工程之永續達成程度。本研究之目的為了解國內市區道路工程對台灣市區綠道路評估系統（TUGR）中各項指標要求的準備程度，研究中透過案例分析方法，以九個不同金額規模的市區道路工程，由九案例基於合約要求在綠道路之達成狀況，評估各案例之綠道路得分，及分析案例於TURG各類指標之達成度及指標與合約文件之關聯性，進而提出綠道路指標準備程度提升之建議。

關鍵字

市區綠道路評估系統 ； 永續指標 ； 準備程度 ； 困難原因

並列摘要

In 2020, the Construction Planning Agency, Ministry of Interior proposed the Taiwan Urban Green Roadways (TUGR) Rating System to systematically evaluate urban roadway projects' sustainability. The system includes 25 sustainability indicators in seven categories: ecology, materials and energy resources, waste and pollution, livability, community and humanities, economy, and innovations. This study aims to understand the readiness the state of the practice of urban roadway projects in design and construction. The study adopted the case analysis method to analyze nine urban roadway projects with different project scales. It evaluated the score of TURG according to the extent to which the contractual requirements of each case achieve the TURG sustainability indicators. After analyzing the degree of achievement of various indicators of TURG and the correlation between indicators and contract documents, the study then put forward suggestions for improving the preparation level of TURG sustainability indicators.

並列關鍵字

Taiwan Urban Green Roadways ； sustainable indicator ； readiness ； difficulty reason

參考文獻

CEEQUAL, http://www.ceequal.com/about/, assessed on july 20th (2021).

Envision, https://www.asce.org/envision/, assessed on july 20th, (2021).

FWHA, “INVEST Economic, Social, Environmental Sustainable Highways Self-Evaluation Tool v1.2, Federal Highway Administration,” (2015).

GreenLITES Project Design Certification Programme, “New York State Department of Transportation,” (2010).

Greenroads Foundation, “Greenroads RATING SYSTEM V2. Greenroads Foundation,” Washington, D.C. (2015).