摘要
王船山的體認論是其哲學思想的重要組成部分。體認主體與客體的關係，被概括爲能所、神形、學思範疇。本文闡明能所範疇的由來、內涵，分析能所的體用、發副、思位、己物、內外關係。詮釋了其體認論的形、神、物三要素的內容，以及三相合而相知的關係，探索知覺運動與情、欲的對應；心神思慮是在知覺經驗體認基礎上的推理、判斷，而獲得道德理性的體認。進而本文探討了作爲個體人如何獲得知識？求知的途徑是什麼？指出學與思二途，並把踐履作爲學的內涵之一。指出學思相資並進，而批評「純固之士」和「敏斷之士」這兩種傾向；以及學思新故相資和顯微相次的關係。
並列摘要
The question ”Where does the sign link up with the world?” is of pivotal significance in Wittgenstein's whole philosophy. The starting-point of his later concept of the world is based on a critical reflection of his early concept of language. The meaning of language cannot be given by what is in the world, but how we use language; the grammar of each particular language-game. Language is not a representation of the world, but a form of representation. The use of language itself is a creative practice, it expresses how we look at the world. What is of importance is how we look at things, not how things are in themselves. The world is the ”world” I perceive, it is a kind of Weltanschauung. Hence, how the world is a question of the will, not understanding.
被引用紀錄
延伸閱讀
- 曾昭旭（1976）。論王船山之即氣言體（下）。鵝湖月刊，(11)，22-26。https://doi.org/10.29652/LM.197605.0006
- 曾昭旭（1976）。論王船山之即氣言體（上）。鵝湖月刊，(10)，8-14。https://doi.org/10.29652/LM.197604.0003
- 張立文（1998）。王船山的體認論（下）。哲學與文化，25(11)，1034-1048。https://doi.org/10.7065/MRPC.199811.1034
- 廖義男（1988）。Rechtsprobleme Der Strassenplanung Und Der Enteignung。臺大法學論叢，17(2)，71-116。https://doi.org/10.6199/NTULJ.1988.17.02.03
- 李東穎（2016）。On the meaning of the debate on ＂Wirtschaftsverfassung＂ in Germany。東吳法律學報，27(4)，69-100。https://www.airitilibrary.com/Article/Detail?DocID=02593750-201604-201609190010-201609190010-69-100