中國邏輯研究的方法論和形上學問題

在中國邏輯史研究的過程中，產生了許多的爭議。中國邏輯研究一方面被視為是在邏輯的普遍性基礎之上、進而尋找其特殊性的一個研究；另一方面則有著不存在這種邏輯普遍性、甚至中國思想並沒有邏輯的想法。個人以為中國邏輯研究的問題實與史料詁解和文化問題密不可分，但這兩個問題涉及到的問題層面究竟為何？在史料詁解部分，我們所面臨的是方法論問題，原典正確詁解是否該是脫離現在的背景然後進行的歷史還原？還是只要符合合理性的解釋原則就是正確的詁解；其次，中國邏輯研究中邏輯問題和文化問題常是糾結在一起的，究竟文化問題可不可以決定邏輯問題，也就是說不同的文化有著不同的邏輯的想法究竟成不成立？如果成立的話，那麼又該建立在什麼基礎之上？這些都是中國邏輯研究不可迴避的問題。

關鍵字

基源問題；解釋的一致性；全盤否定論；邏輯一元論；邏輯多元論

並列摘要

Many controversies have arises in the process of studying Chinese logic. The study of Chinese logic, on the one hand, is built on the universal ground of logic in turn to search for the specialties of Chinese logic. On the other hand, it was believed by some people there is no such logical universality or even the idea about logic in Chinese thinking. The writer believes that the problem with the study of Chinese logic is intimately linked with the annotations of historical materials and cultural issues. In terms of the annotations of historical materials, we are confronted with the question about methodologies. Should the correct annotations be taken away from the contemporary context and historically restored? Or should any explanatory principles that can give the rational explanations be the right annotations? Secondly, in the study of Chinese logic, the issue of logic and the issue of culture are often intertwined. Can cultural issues determine logic issues, that is, do different cultures have different logic thinking? If yes, what basis should the disposition be built on? These are the questions that the study of Chinese logic has to answer.