Jacques Derrida felt that Emmanuel Levinas' thought could make readers tremble. Obviously, it is chiefly because Levinas supposed an ”Absolutely Other.” Although many years passed since Derrida deconstructed this trembling thought, it could still have effects upon us as before. To the hegemony and sameness implied in today's increasing globalization, it is still a heavy bomb. At least, this essay insists, the modern theory of dialogue would be upset from the very basis. For the ”absolutely other” , the underpinning of dialogue will no longer be such a thesis, ”same heart, and so same reason”, nor ”communicative reason”, and therefore the aim for a dialogue will not be ”knowledge-sharing”, ”communication”, ”agreement”, but ”face to face”, in which eventually the other is still the other, and difference still difference.