並列摘要
In the essay, I want to disscuss Maritain's concept of freedom. If we want to understand some obscure thoughts about Maritain, we have to understand Thomas's thoughts. In the essay entitled ”The Conquest of Freedom.”, Maritain illustrates what freedom means. He indicates it is inseparable between the notions of personality and independent freedom .It is therefore necessary to study the Thomistic concepts of the will as nature (voluntas ut natura) and the will as reason (voluntas ut ratio). My purpose in this paper will be twofold: to consider first of all the differences which Maritain establishes between individuality and personality, and secondly, to understand what he says about freedom by placing it within the Thomistic context which is both philosophical and theological.
延伸閱讀
- Ramos, A. (2006). 位格人與“自由的征服”. 哲學與文化, 33(9), 35-48. https://doi.org/10.7065/MRPC.200609.0035
- 藍逸之（2007）。評析高高屏都市區域治理策略中的在地永續性定著：一個新自由主義空間的視角。建築與規劃學報，8(2)，115-137。https://doi.org/10.30054/JAP.200709.0003
- 石敏敏（2008）。論尼撒的格列高利的自由意志學說。道風：基督教文化評論，(28)，221-243。https://www.airitilibrary.com/Article/Detail?DocID=P20170411002-200801-201705100023-201705100023-221-243
- 高凌霞（1996）。位格思想與行動主體。哲學論集，(29)，9-27。https://doi.org/10.29699/FJPS.199606.0002
- 吳豐維（2017）。Freedom, Evolution, and Contentment。生命教育研究，9(2)，67-90。https://doi.org/10.3966/207466012017120902005