海德格究竟主張神學性的哲學或哲學性的神學？－與胡塞爾及鄂蘭立場的比較來看

Dose Heidegger Stand for a Theological Philosophy or a Philosophical Theology? In Comparison with Husserl's and Arendt's Position

汪文聖(Wen-Sheng Wang)

《哲學與文化》 38卷3期 (2011/03) Pp. 75-93

https://doi.org/10.7065/MRPC.201103.0075

摘要

本文首先以胡塞爾與漢娜鄂蘭的哲學為代表來說明哲學性神學的可能意義：胡塞爾將基督教的義涵建立在希臘哲學的基礎上，而這是以作為哲學起點的驚訝基調為因素的；鄂蘭將基督教世俗化於哲學裡，而這是以隱喻性的語言同時為哲學的語言為因素的。本文接著提出西方哲學中圖像性語言的可能，並從這個角度來看一種非哲學性的神學。最後本文從海德格哲學中所具的離逸性基調與圖像性語言來詮釋其哲學為一種神學性的哲學。

關鍵字

海德格 ； 胡塞爾 ； 鄂蘭 ； 現象學 ； 神學 ； 驚訝 ； 離逸 ； 隱喻 ； 圖像

並列摘要

This article at first explains some possible meanings of philosophical theology, represented by Edmund Husserl's and Hannah Arendt's philosophy: Husserl lays the foundation of the significance of Christianity in the Greek philosophy, and bases this consideration in the attunement of surprise as the begin of philosophy; Arendt secularizes Christianity in philosophy, and realizes this idea in her understanding of the metaphor language as philosophical language. The article then proposes a possibility of the image language in the Western philosophy, and from this point of view understands a non philosophical theology. Lastly, the article, based on the attunement of evasion and image language in Heidegger's philosophy, interprets his philosophy as a kind of theological philosophy.

並列關鍵字

Heidegger ； Husserl ； Arendt ； Phenomenology ； Theology ； Surprise ； Evasion ； Metaphor ； Image

參考文獻

Arendt, Hannah(1979).Vom Leben des Geistes.München:Piper.

Augustine,Chadwick, Henry(trans. Introduction Note)(1991).Confessions.Oxford:Oxford University Press.

Heidegger, Martin(1995).Phänomenologie des religiösen Lebens.Frankfurt a. M.:Klostermann.

Bernauer, S. J.(ed.),James, W.(ed.)(1987).Amor Mundi: Explorations in the Faith and Thought of Hannah Arendt.Boston:Martinus Nij hoff Publishers.

Crowe, Benjamin D.(2006).Heidegger's Religious Origin: Destruction and Authenticity.Bloomington:Indiana University Press.