儒家德性倫理的當代理論意義

The Signification of Confucian Ethics of Virtue in Contemporary Theory

龔群(Qun Gong)

《哲學與文化》 38卷4期 (2011/04) Pp. 159-174

https://doi.org/10.7065/MRPC.201104.0159

摘要

在西方古代，傳統德性倫理學是以古希月臘的亞里斯多德為代表的，當代復興西方德性倫理學也主要是從亞里斯多德那裡尋求思想資源。德性倫理學以行為者為中心或與行為者為基礎，關注的中心是人的善與幸福，而德性是其中心範疇。對人是什麼或人應當是什麼的研究是德性倫理學首要研究的任務，從對人是什麼或應是什麼之中，得出人應當做什麼的行為要求。從對人的道德規定（君子）的意義上，中國傳統的儒家德性倫理學從典範意義上給予了十分豐富的、不同於西方的探討。成為什麼人是中國德性倫理學研究的中心，並因此有著相應十分豐富的德目。這為當代中國構建德性倫理學以及當代一般德性倫理學理論提供了寶貴的資源。

關鍵字

德性 ； 君子

並列摘要

In ancient Western, Aristotle is the represent of traditional virtue ethics and the contemporary revivification of Western ethics of virtue found its resources mainly from Aristotle. Virtue ethics take agent as its center or as its ground and good and happiness of human being as its main concern, and virtue is its centre concenpt. What is human or what human beings should become to, which are the primary task for virtue ethics. The demands for actions come from what is human or human beings should become to. Confucian ethics of virtue studied fully of what kind of person is one moral man (a gentleman), and the way is totally different from Western one. The center of Chinese traditional ethics of virtue is that what human beings should become to and therefore it has rich ideas about virtues. We can find one different resource for our construction of Chinese ethics of virtue and theory of virtue ethics in general...

並列關鍵字

Virtues ； Gentleman

參考文獻

Anscombe, G. E. M.(1958).Modern Moral Philosophy.33(124),1-19.

亞里斯多德、苗力田譯(1999)。尼可馬克倫理學。中國社會科學出版社。

(1997).Virtue Ethics.Oxford:Oxford University Press.

Hursthouse, Rosalind(1999).On Virtue Ethics.Oxford:Oxford University Press.

《孟子‧告子上》。