柏拉圖哲思與體系性詮釋學之方法學向度

所謂體系性詮釋學乃是一種普通哲思的原創性構思：一則以詮釋學轉向為當代哲學之嶄新出發，另則以體系性對於詮釋學之基設、原素及基本模式等進行哲思，而成為哲學西方之創新典範。就此種體系性詮釋學為一種哲思進路或方法而言，遂與西方傳統哲學之諸方法、尤其是自古典希臘哲學以來的語言學三學亦即後來的邏輯學三學－文法學、辯證法及修辭學具淵源關係。本文試圖從先蘇時期之宇宙論玄元哲思及其所源生的西方哲學基源觀念問題為脈絡出發，思想柏拉圖哲思、尤其是其思想發展中後期的對話錄《巴門尼德斯》篇與《辯士》篇中理念論及辯證法之基本思路，亦即其如何以理念辯證法處理先蘇哲學所遺留的基源哲學觀念間的、特別是衝突關係之問題。

關鍵字

體系性詮釋學；方法學；存有學；先蘇哲學；柏拉圖；理念論；辯證法

並列摘要

The so-called systemic hermeneutics is an original conception of a meta-theory of hermeneutics: at the one hand, it takes the hermeneutic turn as the new staring point for contemporary philosophy, and at the other hand it designs systemic as the general idea for philosophizing the ground-presuppositions, the fundamental elements and the basic model of hermeneutics, and tries to develop a innovative paradigm of Western philosophy. Regarding systemic hermeneutics as such a philosophizing approach or methodology, it has origin-relation with the various methods of traditional Western philosophy, especially medieval trivium from classical Greek philosophy, the liberal arts of general grammar, logic or dialectics, and classical rhetoric. Beginning from the pre-Socratic cosmological arche-philosophizing and its original but problematic ideas for Western philosophy as context, this paper attempts to understand Platonic philosophizing, above all the basic thinking-way from the theory of ideas and its dialectics in his middle and later thought-development, In particular it shall reveal, how he deals with the basic, specially conflict relation between the original ideas fron the pre-Socratic philosophy in Dialogue ＂Parmenides＂ and ＂Sophist＂.