透過您的圖書館登入
IP:3.145.201.71
  • 期刊

臺灣新士林哲學界對知識理論的闡述:繼承與轉化

The Explication of Epistemology by the Scholars of Taiwan Neo‐scholasticism: Inheritance and Transformation

摘要


本文共分五小節:第一小節前言,簡述士林哲學對於知識論的基本立場與主張。第二小節簡介幾位在臺灣哲學界的前輩士林哲學領域學者,有關知識理論的論著,包含柴熙、羅光、趙雅博、孫振青、張振東、王臣瑞、關永中、袁廷棟。第三小節士林哲學之於形上學的態度,傳統士林哲學的知識論肯定認識的結論可以肯定客觀實體的存在,當代超驗多瑪斯主義則結合康德哲學的超驗方法肯定形上學的基礎。第四節,士林哲學知識論內在的繼承與轉化以及在臺灣發展的繼承與轉化,一方面說明西洋士林哲學知識理論由傳統士林哲學的理論,因著結合康德哲學的超驗方法而有了理論上的繼承與轉化;另一方面在臺灣的士林哲學界,在知識論領域的研究學者們也在世代傳承中有其在地化的繼承與轉化。第五節結論。

並列摘要


This article proceeds along five sections: the first section summarizes the basic positions and claims of scholasticism on epistemology; the second section introduces the writings by the senior scholars of Taiwan scholasticism, including Chai Hsi, Lo Kuang, Chao Ya-po, Sun Chen-ching, Chang Chen-tung, Wang Chen-rei, Kuan Yung-chung and Yuan Ting-tung. The third section states the attitudes of scholasticism toward metaphysics as the epistemology of traditional scholasticism confirms the existence of objective entities and contemporary transcendental Thomism, in combination with the transcendental methodology of Kantian philosophy, approves the foundation of metaphysics. The fourth section addresses the internal inheritance and transformation of scholastic epistemology as well as the inheritance and transformation of its development in Taiwan. On the one hand, we explain how western scholastic epistemology is inherited and transformed due to its combination with the transcendental methodology of Kantian philosophy; on the other hand, we discuss how the scholars of scholastic epistemology in Taiwan are locally inherited and transformed. The fifth section is our conclusion.

參考文獻


王臣瑞(2000)。知識論.心靈與存有。臺北:臺灣學生書局。
李政達(2006)。基本知識論。臺北:哲學與文化月刊社。
汪斯丹博根李貴良譯(1967)。知識與方法之批判。臺北:臺灣商務印書館。
孫振青(1994)。知識論。臺北:五南圖書出版公司。
柴熙(2002)。認識論。臺北:臺灣商務印書館。

延伸閱讀