《厚父》「典刑」考

Textual Research on Criminal Laws in Hou Fu

李若暉(Ruohui LI)

《哲學與文化》 44卷10期 (2017/10) Pp. 63-79

摘要

清華簡第五冊《厚父》一文，多言夏史，足補史之闕文。該篇所敘殆為成湯滅夏立商，咨於有夏遺臣厚父之作。而篇首亦追溯夏后建邦，始於大禹濬川。其開篇行文模仿〈洪範〉，而於篇中所敘治國之要，遠遜洪範九疇，殆非周史所傳舊文，更非孔子所刪《尚書》，當出戰國之世。〈豳公盨〉亦首言天命禹濬川，而歸於克用茲德，斯誠周禮之故轍。《厚父》與之相反，於刑德二者，棄德明刑。既以皋陶之威延於夏啟，又揄揚孔甲典刑，為先哲王。《國語》以孔甲為夏衰之始，《厚父》乃謂背孔甲方致夏亡。墨者誦《詩》《書》無異於儒，而背周道以用夏政。墨者鉅子腹(黃享)於秦惠王前嚴守墨者之法。《厚父》蓋秦墨習於《書》學者徵夏史以明典刑之作。晁錯傳《尚書》之學而為申商之行，此一學脈絕不出於仲尼，當始於秦墨之為《厚父》者一系。

關鍵字

《厚父》 ； 《尚書》 ； 典刑 ； 墨家

並列摘要

Hou Fu, The fifth volume of Tsinghua Bamboo Slips, is mainly about the history of the Xia Dynasty which can be served as a supplement to the historical gap in this dynasty. It's said that Hou Fu was a collection of sayings and ideas attributed to a civil official named Hou Fu, a survivor of the conquered Xia Dynasty. It mainly narrated the process of Tang launched a righteous revolt to fight against the Xia Dynasty and then founded the Shang Dynasty. Besides, it referred Yu the Great who dredged the Yellow River and then founded the Xia Dynasty. The governing plans mentioned in Hou Fu can't be compared with the nine plans of Hong Fan, though it imitated the latter's style in the beginning. In my opinion, it was completed in the Warring States period, neither a part of the historical records of the Zhou Dynasty nor the chapters deleted by Confucius in Book of Documents. Zhugongxu claimed that Yu the Great was appointed by God to dredge the Yellow River at first while afterwards it stressed on the importance of benevolent governance, which was actually another manifestation of the rites of the Zhou Dynasty. On the contrary, Hou Fu attached more importance to punishment than to virtues when it comes to country governance. Only those who carry forward the impartiality of Gao Yao and advocate the punishment like Kong Jia can be a great sage. Discourses of the States held it that the Xia Dynasty began to go downhill since King Kong Jia came into power, while Hou Fu claimed the opposite. Though Mohists can recite Book of Odes and Book of Documents as fluently as Confucianists, they abandoned the rites of Zhou and followed the tradition of the Xia Dynasty. Fu Tun, the Juzi (literally, ＂chisel＂-- an image from craft making) of Mohism, scrupulously abided by the doctrine as a Mohist before King Hui of Qin State. Mohists in the Qin state who had the Confucian classics at their fingertips cited the traditions of the XiaDynasty to stress the importance of punishment, and then Hou Fu came out. Chao Cuo inherited the thought of Book of Documents and restricted the development of business, which was not originated from Confucius but Hou Fu written by Mohists in the Qin state.

並列關鍵字

Hou Fu ； Book of Documents ； Penalty of Codes ； Mohism

參考文獻

李學勤編(2015)。清華大學藏戰國竹簡。上海:中西書局。

(2002)。豳公盨。中國歷史文物。6(41)，4。

(1988)。國語。上海:上海古籍出版社。

于大成()。

福田哲之()。