晚清關學中朱子學之學術空間

明末清初之學術主要基於對王學末流弊端之反思，部分王門後學或返朱，或調和朱、王，回歸經學元典。乾、嘉時期，漢學作為理學之反動獨盛，居學術主流地位，但其間存在漢學與宋學之爭。此時偏於一隅之關學未曾走向乾嘉漢學，而按晚明理學之軌轍，呈現出朱子學與陽明學兩系並行發展之面向。晚清關學李元春、賀瑞麟一系持守朱子學甚固，對視為理學「異端」之漢學與陽明學進行批判，以維護朱子學之權威，並著意承接張載之關學傳統。本論文以文獻分析之方法，對晚清以來關學中之朱子學者對學術轉型與社會激變所做之反應進行研究，以示晚清關學中朱子學之學術形態。

關鍵字

晚清；關學；朱子學；學術空間

並列摘要

The academics in the late Ming and early Qing dynasties were mainly based on reflections on the malpractices of Wang Xue. Some successors of Wang Xue returned to Zhu Zi Xue, or reconciled Zhu Zi Xue with Wang Xue and returned to the original Jing Xue. During the Qianlong and Jiaqing periods, Sinology as a critic of Neo-Confucianism, has become the leading academic. However, there was still an academic dispute between Sinology and Song Xue. Due to the remoteness of the Guan Xue region in this time period, the Sinology academic group did not form. According to the trajectory of Neo-Confucianism in the late Ming Dynasty, the two schools of Zhu Zi Xue and Yang Ming Xue coexisted. In the late Qing Dynasty, Li Yuanchun and He Ruilin were determined successors of Zhu Zi Xue. They criticized Sinology and Yangminglogy which regarded as 'heretics' of Neo-Confucianism, in order to maintain the academic authority of Zhu Zi Xue and purposefully to inherit Zhang Zai's academic tradition of Guan Xue. This paper uses the method of literature analysis to study the academic responses of scholars who inherited Zhu Zi Xue in Guan Xue since the late Qing Dynasty of academic trasformation and social upheaval, to present the academic form of Zhu Zi Xue in the late Qing Dynasty.