Technê and Understanding

技藝與理解

蔡政宏(Cheng-Hung Tsai)

《國立臺灣大學哲學論評》 47期 (2014/03) Pp. 39-60

https://doi.org/10.6276/NTUPR.2014.03.(47).02

摘要

人是如何獲得「理解」？德性知識論的代表人物Linda Zagzebski長久來宣稱「理解的獲得來自於對技藝的掌握」。在本文中，作者闡釋Zagzebski的宣稱，並指出這宣稱的問題。透過對Zagzebski之宣稱的批判性檢視，作者在文後提供另一修改自Zagzebski的理解獲得觀點。

關鍵字

技藝 ； 技巧 ； 解釋 ； 識知 ； 理解

並列摘要

How can we acquire understanding? Linda Zagzebski has long claimed that understanding is acquired through, or arises from, mastering a particular practical technê. In this paper, I explicate Zagzebski's claim and argue that the claim is problematic. Based on a critical examination of Zagzebski's claim, I propose, in conclusion and in brief, a new claim regarding the acquisition of understanding.

並列關鍵字

technê ； skill ； explanation ； epistêmê ； understanding

參考文獻

Annas, Julia (2011a). Intelligent Virtue. Oxford: Oxford University Press. doi: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199228782.001.0001.

Annas, Julia(2011b). “Practical Expertise.” John Bengson & Marc A. Moffett (eds.). Knowing How: Essays on Knowledge, Mind, and Action (101-112). Oxford: Oxford University Press. doi: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195389364.003.0004.

Cassam, Quassim (2007). The Possibility of Knowledge. Oxford: Oxford University Press. doi: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199208319.001.0001.

Dreyfus, Hubert (1988). “The Socratic and Platonic Basis of Cognitivism.” AI and Society, 2: 99-112. doi: 10.1007/BF01891374.

Grimm, Stephen (2006). “Is Understanding a Species of Knowledge?” British Journal of Philosophy of Science, 57: 515-535. doi: 10.1093/bjps/axl015.