美國史家對進步運動的解釋之演變

The Changes in the Interpretation of the Progressive Movement of the United States

孫同勛(Tung-Hsun Sun)

《華岡文科學報》 22期 (1998/03) Pp. 191-214

https://doi.org/10.6361/HKJH.199803.0191

摘要

在本文中，作者在進步史學派、諧和史學派、新左史學派與當前的史學家中選擇了一些具代表性史家，對他們有關進步運動的看法進行了分析。作者結論謂自進步派史家到西元1980年代，美國專業史家對進步運動的解釋至少已經歷了進步史家的二分衝突論、諧和史家的調適論、新左史家的反商論，以及當前史家的多元論等四次改變，而每一次改變都反映了當時流行的思潮。

關鍵字

進步運動 ； 進步派史學 ； 新保守史學 ； 新左派史學

並列摘要

After an analysis of the opinions of selected leading Progressive historians, Consensus historians, New-left historians and contemporary historians, the author comes to the conclusion that ever since the Progressive historians began to write about the movement in which they had played an important role, the interpretation of the Progressive Movement has undergone at least four changes: from the Progressive historian's stress on conflict, through the Consensus historian's emphasis on adjustment and New-left historian's anti-establishment sentiment to present day historian's view of multiplicity. He also believes that each of these interpretations reflects the prevailing climate of opinion of the age in which it was produced.

並列關鍵字

Progressive Movement ； Progressive history ； Neo-conservative history ； New-left history