從CIC與David M.等(2003)指出,DQI(Design Quality Indicator)將是提升建築物設計品質,與建築物相關所有人的溝通橋樑。因此,本研究以「音環境」、「光環境」及「空氣環境」等住宅室內環境評估項目,應用建築物設計品質性能,透過國內的新建住宅案操作,以「我國內政部建研所計畫」(TDQI)與「日本品確法」(JDQI)的評估方式個別試算後,其評估結果分為:完全相同、無法比較與二者間有差異性。從二者間有差異性之評估結果,得知「JDQI」在樓板衝擊音項目與「TDQI」,在評估基準等級認定上有顯著差異性。在各個案例評估結果,大面積之雙拼或獨棟式住宅單元,仍具有較高的室內環境空間性能之綜合性能評價水準。
The DQI (Design Quality Indicator) has helped to raise the profile of design quality, and can be used to articulate the subjective qualities felt by different stakeholders in the design process and thereafter in the use of a building. Therefore, in this paper, it applies 'Design Quality Indicator' to evaluate 'acoustics', 'daylighting and illumination', 'indoor air quality' of indoor environment performance with 'Japan Promotion Codes for the Assurance of Housing Quality' and 'Taiwan Design Quality Indicator' (TDQI) for new housing projects. By comparison, it presents three assessment results: agreement, disagreement and impossibility of comparison. A disagreement of the assessment result, is the Floor Impact Sound item. Furthermore, this paper proposes that the dwelling types of a double and single unit have a high performance level of indoor environment evaluation.