木構造構法研發在實作教育之實踐

Study on the Construction Method of Wooden Structure and Its Application in Practical Education

廖婉茹(Wan-Ju Liao) ； 湯潔新(Chieh-Hsin Tang)

《建築學報》 120_S期：建築設計教學及設計教育專刊Ⅳ (2022/06) Pp. 43-52

https://doi.org/10.53106/101632122022060120009

摘要

本文為補充說明木構造設計作品「向陽小巢」在教學上的實踐，說明木構造作品實作過程所遭遇的課題與教學上的回饋。本作品不僅在木構造具有創新的意義，在教學上亦有明確的結果。1.圖面到實作：傳統教學方式具有按部就班、穩扎穩打優勢，扎實的過程適合低年級操作。2.細部設計：透過細部設計才能真實理解構法開發的重要性。3.木構造再現：跳脫以往木構造印象，藉由其他材料加入後，木構造可以完整詮釋設計構想。

關鍵字

木構造 ； 構法研發 ； 實作教育 ； 實作競賽

並列摘要

This article is a supplement to further illustrate hands-on learning based on the wooden structure design work of ＂Hsiangyang Hsiaochao,＂ explaining the problems encountered in implementing the wooden structure work and the feedback on the instruction. This work not only demonstrates the innovative significance of the wooden structural design, but also shows clear results in teaching. 1. From drawing to practice: The traditional teaching method has the advantages of step-by-step procedure and steady progress, and the solid learning process is suitable for students in lower grades. 2. Detailed design: Only through detailed design can students truly understand the importance of construction method development. 3. Reproduction of the wooden structure: Cast off previous impressions of wooden structures. After other materials have been added, the wooden structure can fully interpret the design concept in detail.

並列關鍵字

Wooden Structure ； Construction Method R&D ； Practical Education ； Practical Competition

參考文獻

Pallasmaa, J. (2017). Embodied and existential wisdom in architecture: The thinking hand. Body & Society, 23(1), 96-111. https ://doi.org/10.1177/13570 34X1668144 3

Baudoin, G. (2016). A matter of tolerance. The Plan Journal, 33-46.

Burry, M. (2014). The architectural detail and the fear of commitment. Architectural Design, 4(230), 134-141.

Ford, E. (2011). The Architectural Detail. NY, USA: Princeton Architectural Press.

Frascari, M. (1984). The tell-the-tale detail. In VIA 7: The Building of architecture, 23-37.