酒駕重罰下，「喝酒不開車，開車不喝酒」？酒駕政策效果的評估

＂DON'T DRINK AND DRIVE＂?-ASSESSMENT OF THE EFFECTS OF DRUNK DRIVING POLICES

詹昀姗(Yun-Shan Chan) ； 尤素娟(Suchuan Yu) ； 蔡偉德(Wei-Der Tsai)

《運輸計劃季刊》 51卷2期 (2022/06) Pp. 117-142

摘要

政府過去數次修法加重酒駕刑事罰和行政罰，希望全面扼止酒駕事件的發生。本文結合民國97－109年6月內政部警政署交通事故調查報告表資料，評估多次酒駕政策修法的成效。研究結果發現：若以民國97年至100年12月的酒駕狀況為對照組，後續三次修法加重酒駕的處罰，使駕駛人酒駕機率累計下降70%，同時高酒精濃度駕駛人的佔比也明顯降低。此外，我們的估計結果顯示：民國101－109年間酒駕罰則的修法，使酒駕肇事的死亡人數累計減少2,498人，但受傷人數卻無明顯變化，可能的原因是中低酒測值之酒駕者人數的提高，造成受傷人數的增加，抵消了因高酒測值者下降所減少受傷的人數。歷次嚴懲酒駕的修法的確對降低酒駕行為有明顯的成效，但未能完全促使駕駛人分離“飲酒＂與“開車＂的行為，達到「喝酒不開車，開車不喝酒」的政策目的。

關鍵字

酒駕 ； 刑法第185-3條 ； 道路交通管理處罰條例第35條 ； 酒駕行政懲罰 ； 酒駕刑事懲罰

並列摘要

This paper empirically analyzes the effects of drunk driving policies. Since 2008, the government has revised criminal law 185-3 and article 35 of Road Traffic Management and Punishment Regulations, aiming to eliminate drunk driving events by increasing criminal and administrative punishments for drunk driving. Based on the 2008-2020 Investigation Report of Traffic Accidents from the National Police Agency, Ministry of the Interior, we assessed the effectiveness of the multiple amendments to the drunk driving policies in reducing drunk drivers and alcohol-related casualties. Taking the drunk driving ratio from 2008 to early December 2011 as the control group, we found that the three subsequent amendments of drunk driving policies until June 2020 did cumulatively reduce the probability of drunk driving by 70%. The distribution curve of the BrAC value of drunk drivers who took the alcohol test also shifted to the left; in other words, drunk drivers drink less in response to severe punishments. The three subsequent amendments to the drunk driving policies also reduced the alcohol-related mortality by 2,498 deaths but did not significantly reduce the overall number of injured. A plausible reason might be that the increase of low/middle BrAC drivers may cause a rise in injuries, but it offsets the reduced injuries associated with fewer high BrAC drivers. The new policies did not wholly persuade the drivers to separate the ＂drinking＂ and ＂driving＂ and achieve the goal of ＂do not drink and drive.＂ Our results offer policy implications for further deterrence of drunk driving.

並列關鍵字

Drunk driving ； DUI ； Article 185-3 of Criminal Law ； Article 35 of Road Traffic Management and Punishment Regulations ； administrative punishment for drunk driving ； criminal punishment for drunk driving

參考文獻

蔡偉德，「酒駕罰則是否有效抑制酒駕？中斷點迴歸設計的應用」，經濟論文叢刊，第 47 卷，第 1 期，民國 108 年，頁 75-126。

Levitt, S. D. and Porter, J., “How Dangerous Are Drinking Drivers?”, Journal of Political Economy, Vol.109, No.6, 2001, pp.1198-1237.

Saffer, H., “Alcohol Advertising and Motor Vehicle Fatalities”, The Review of Economics and Statistics, Vol.79, No.3, 1997, pp.431-442.

Elder, R. W., Lawre, B., Ferguson, A., Naimi, T. S., Brewer, R. D., Chattopadhyay, S. K., Toomey, T. L., and Fielding, J. E., “The Effectiveness of Tax Policy Intervention for Reducing Excessive Alcohol Consuumption and Related Harms”, American Journal of Preventive Medicine, Vol.38, No.2, 2010, pp.217-229.

Cook, P. J., and Durrance, C. P., “The Virtuous Tax: Lifesaving and Crime-Prevention Effects of the 1991 Federal Alcohol-Tax Increase”, Journal of Health Economics, Vol.32, No.1, 2013, pp. 261-267.