摘要
本文研究美國與歐洲各國對獨占事業獨占性訂價的規定和執行，發現歐洲地區強調消費者福利的保護，政策上著重於市場短期獨占力量濫用的防止，視獨占性訂價爲違法行爲。美國則重視市場競爭狀態的维持，偏重於市場長期障礙的排除，認爲獨占性訂價有促進市場競爭的效果，因此對它採寬容態度。二者政策的差異，亦可用經濟長短期觀點加以解釋。 至於對獨占性訂價採行管制時，政府主管當局將面臨的困難有1)獨占事業成本的衡量，2)正常報酬率的估計。這些是公平會未來對獨占力量管制的重要課題。
關鍵字
無資料並列摘要
This paper studies the laws of monopolistic pricing prevailed in the United Stated and the European countries, and their enforcement. It finds out that the European antitrust policy emphasize on the protection of consumer welfare. Therefore, the abuse of monopolistic pricing is prohibited on the short run. On the other hand, the U.S. antitrust policy pay attentions to the maintenance of market competition, and cares more about exclusion of long tern berriers. The U.S. tends to belief the monopolistic pricing might have the pro-competition effect and deserves looser enforcement. The difference of two policies can be explained by the comparsion between the short run and the long run theories of economy. The government agency will face at least two problems in the enforcement of The Fair Trade Law. Firstly, the measurement of a monopolist's cost. Secondly, the estimation of monopolist's normal rate of return. These are the major works The Fair Trade Commission of Taiwan has to face in the future monopoly power regulation.