This paper studies discriminatory import policy in an oligopoly model in which the foreign firms may influence the incumbent government's policy via campaign contributions. It is shown that given a linear demand, the optimal policy is to impose a tax (subsidy) if the government has a high affinity for social welfare (campaign contributions). Moreover, the tariff difference is influenced by two factors: the government's valuation of social welfare relative to contributions, and the cost difference among the firms. Furthermore, when the government cares more for social welfare, the tariff will be higher (lower) for the firm with lower (higher) average cost. In contrast, if the government places a high weight on campaign contributions, the optimal import policy is to subsidize imports and firms with lower (higher) average cost will be given a higher (lower) subsidy.